San Diego Real Estate Forum
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

Clairemont / MesaCollege Short Term Rental?
Hi San Diego Investors,
I inherited a couple of 3/2 single family homes in East Clairemont free and clear a couple of years ago within very easy walking distance of Mesa College. I have them stabilized now and producing income, but the ROE is just not good even when appreciation is taken into account. I've taken out a 50% LTV 30 year on one of the homes to fund some projects in my home state of Vermont, but there is still so much non working capital that I am strongly considering selling one or both homes. I am reluctant to give up my Prop 13 tax breaks, and dreams of retiring to a home in San Diego with a low tax burden, but the returns just aren't making sense at market rents. My question to the group is would any of you advocate converting to short term rentals in this location? Have you done it? Do the numbers work? Is the regulatory environment manageable/sustainable? And if not, I'm looking for a realtor who specializes in advising on cosmetic rehabs and has a proven track record of maximizing seller profits. Any opinions and trustworthy referrals for either strategy would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Matt
Most Popular Reply

Originally posted by @Matthew Ware:
To Bryce's point. These places haven't done terribly given my low tax basis. Looking at my 2017 and 2018 numbers and using the imperfect data of Zillow Zestimates. (garbage in garbage out I know, but it at least helps me compare apples to apples) The combined value of the two properties were worth about 1.1m as of January of 2017 and appreciated to roughly 1.25 in January of 2019. My net income after taxes, insurance, Property Mgmt, 2 move outs, deferred maintenance etc. was 95K so around 250k after two years counting appreciation. That's over 20% by my math. Thoughts?
Slightly less than half that for per year return. Why less than half? Due to compounding. Slightly less than 10% is not bad and with use of a PM you have it probably close to optimal on the active/passive investment. From your earlier response, you realize that the return on equity would have been significantly higher if you had got a 70% LTV.
Another concern is that a lot of that return is based on appreciation. San Diego has a great history of appreciation but it has come in phases. We are on a long duration of high appreciation phase (7 or 8 years). At some point there will be a lull or some depreciation. Without the appreciation your return is $95K on $625K equity for the 2 years. So around 7% annual. Not bad but could be a lot better but likely better requires more effort than what you have exerted for the 7% return.
You could keep the property with virtually no effort and do OK. Or you could search out a better investment committing the time and resources to find and acquire and probably do a little better. Not a bad position where the worse case is pretty good.
I think your biggest risks are 1) some sort of loss of Prop 13 protection could significantly impact your return. 2) a depreciation cycle in the short term could hurt your return but the prices have always bounced back.
Good luck