Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Los Angeles County Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

60
Posts
17
Votes
Minh Nguyen
  • Los Angeles, CA - California
17
Votes |
60
Posts

Primary residence considerations

Minh Nguyen
  • Los Angeles, CA - California
Posted

Hi,

I'm considering buying my first home in LA as my primary residence. I will probably live in it for a couple years then rent it out and hold for long term. I'm looking at central LA for the most part, from Culver City to Silverlake and everything in between and around the 550-650k price range. I'll also be looking to pick up rental properties out of state after this purchase.

This seems to make more sense than renting at the moment with the interest rates and tax advantages. However, everything I've looked at so far is cash flow negative. I'm sure there are great deals out there but I'm not sure if/when I'll find it - and at some point, there will probably be diminishing returns on my efforts.

A couple questions to help me understand when I've found something good enough:

1. Do I just need to dig deeper or is this pretty much how it is in LA for the time being?
2. Can I take a little weight off the cash flow numbers since I'll be living it in for a few years?  Or is it an absolute sin to pick up something  that isn't at least cash flow neutral? I expect rents to continue to appreciate over the years, but what do I know.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,663
Posts
3,093
Votes
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
3,093
Votes |
2,663
Posts
David Faulkner
  • Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied

If you define a deal as something that has high cash flow on day 1, then you will never buy anything in LA, and that would be a mistake in my opinion. I assess a deal based on the discount to ARV that I can get, the forced appreciation I can create, and the long term historical average rates of market appreciation in that neighborhood for both prices and rents. I plug all those numbers and a few more into an IRR calculation to get an estimate of the long term return. This is for 10+ year hold periods ... who knows what the market will do in the next 1-2 years, so I just make sure I can afford to hold in the short term no matter what, which is where the forced appreciation equity bump helps. It is a competitive market, so deals are hard to find no matter how you define them, but stay at it and be disciplined about it ... strong supply & demand fundamentals cut both ways; that which is hard to buy in the short term is generally easy to sell or rent and tends to appreciate in the long term. The exact opposite tends to be true as well.

Loading replies...