Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

26
Posts
15
Votes
Eric Kulling
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Discovery Bay, CA
15
Votes |
26
Posts

BRRRR vs Traditional

Eric Kulling
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Discovery Bay, CA
Posted

I'm starting to understand why BRRRR is so valuable however I am confused on why you can't borrow against you investment the same way in a "traditional" investment as you would the BRRRR method. For example: traditonal method - if you put 20k down on a 100k house, fix it up (put in another $30k) and refinance for $150k, then are you limited to a certain amount of the $150k you can out?

BRRRR method you will have to buy the house out right for $100k put another $30k to rehab (in for $130k) and refinance for $150k and you are allowed to take out 70% of the 130k you have in it, allowing you to put that money into another property?

I guess the disconnect is why can’t you do the same with the traditional method. Is it because the bank won’t give you the loan in the first example vs the second?

Does any of this make sense? Haha

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,757
Posts
3,109
Votes
Kenneth Garrett
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Florida Panhandle/Illinois
3,109
Votes |
3,757
Posts
Kenneth Garrett
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Florida Panhandle/Illinois
Replied

@Eric Kulling

By buying the property outright you have many advantages.  

  • Buy distressed property at a discount 
  • The rehab forces the equity
  • Property does not qualify for FHA financing or in some cases conventional
  • By forcing the equity through the rehab you can pull your money out. No money left in the project. Your ROI or CoC is infinite.
  • Tenant pays for your mortgage and and all other expenses.  It produces cash flow.
  • This process is repeatable and can produce financial independence for you.
  • Good Luck. 
  • Kenneth Garrett
  • Loading replies...