Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

361
Posts
75
Votes
Joseph Ziolkowski
  • Inspector
  • Alsip, IL
75
Votes |
361
Posts

Seller Protection in a Sub2

Joseph Ziolkowski
  • Inspector
  • Alsip, IL
Posted

Hi all! My sister called a local investor to purchase a townhome that she is making payments on but not living in. There is little equity, and she just wants to be rid of it, and it sounds like he wants to take over payments and leave her name on the mortgage. My question is this. To protect her interests and make sure she doesn't get stuck with a non-paying investor attached to the property, would it be out of line to make it a contingency of the sale that the investor signs a quitclaim deed, put in escrow at the title company, that says that if he doesn't make payments for one month, two months, etc the quitclaim will be released out of escrow and he automatically is off of the property? How might that best be done? Also, would it be out of line to ask him to put x months worth of payment (in line with the quitclaim agreement) in escrow as well, all to be released to her if he defaults? It's the only way I know of to protect her in this. Also in a sub2, is it common to stipulate in the contract a certain time that the property will be sold/refinanced etc to get her name off of it? Sorry so many questions, but I'm a wholesaler, and know little of the ins and outs of sub2's. Thanks for any wisdom you all can offer. :cool:

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,208
Posts
1,439
Votes
Nick J.
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Payson, AZ
1,439
Votes |
3,208
Posts
Nick J.
  • Residential Real Estate Broker
  • Payson, AZ
Replied

Joseph, if your sister doesn't feel comfortable selling sub2 to this guy then give me a call LOL!!!

I know, it's a shameless plug but really. She has to be ok with giving ownership, the quitclaim means nothing. The actual OWNERSHIP will be transferred simply b/c it is an actual SALE of the home. Quitclaims aren't transferred when you buy a house the traditional way and it's certainly no different here other than the existing mortgage stays in place, that's all.

If she's not comfortable with that then have her sell it Lease/Option, Contract for deed or whatever...........

I never put up payments in advance but will always offer to include in the P/S contract that I will deed the property back to the mortgagee if I fall more than 30 days late on the mortgage.

this way, the seller knows that I'm in it for the money and if I don't perform they can have the house back. Guess how many times I've had to do that?......NONE

anyways, hope that helps ,feel free to hit me up. I know a thing or two about a thing or two when it comes to Subs

Loading replies...