Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 month ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5,724
Posts
8,879
Votes
Don Konipol
#1 Innovative Strategies Contributor
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
8,879
Votes |
5,724
Posts

Passive Investor Strategies vs Active Investor Strategies

Don Konipol
#1 Innovative Strategies Contributor
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
Posted

If an investor has the time, knowledge, capital and experience to be an active property investor then there are a number of strategies , that, depending on the economic market can be used to accelerate wealth building.  Some of these strategies (though not all, and possibly not the most profitable) are the subject of constant discussion on BP. 

But, what’s the best strategy for someone who wants to own property, but just as an “aside”; to diversify their portfolio, hedge against inflation, or build a retirement nest egg?

IMO, the best strategy for that type of individual is to purchase residential property in an area they are or can become familiar with; in an area where the neighborhood is “on the rise”, typically where demand exceeds supply and people are spending $$$ on fixing up properties.  Spend what’s needed to upgrade with reliable mechanical systems, roof that doesn’t leak, remediate all mold; interior design modernized; in other words a place that will attract a higher income no hassle tenant.  Then do a thorough research on tenant applicants (note: leaving this to a PM may be hazardous to your financial health) and choose the one that is most “stable” with the best potential for long term tenancy.

This advice is contrary to maximization of rental income, but IMO will reduce expenses of tenant turnover, property damage, property management fees so much that the difference in bottom line income will be quite small.  What the investor will have is a long term appreciating asset; that will provide an increasing cash flow as rental rates increase, and steady amortization as the note is paid down.  And a SUSTAINABLE approach to rental property ownership. 

What’s your opinion? 

  • Don Konipol
business profile image
Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

183
Posts
114
Votes
Dominic Mazzarella
  • Investor
  • Hendersonville, NC
114
Votes |
183
Posts
Dominic Mazzarella
  • Investor
  • Hendersonville, NC
Replied

Both active and passive strategies certainly have their merits. For someone looking for diversification or steady long-term growth without getting too hands-on, your suggestion of buying and upgrading a rental property in a familiar and appreciating area makes a lot of sense. It balances stability with potential for appreciation, especially if you find a reliable tenant.

On the other hand, for investors with time, experience, and a willingness to take on higher risk, active strategies like value-add projects or flipping might yield quicker returns but require deeper involvement. I am in this camp myself, as I do this full time.

I agree with your point about focusing on long-term sustainability rather than chasing maximum rental income at the cost of increased tenant turnover or property damage. A balanced, stable approach often wins out in the long run.

Loading replies...