Innovative Strategies
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 1 year ago,
Commissions to realtors and how you pay them
"Industry standard" seems to be that you pay a percentage of the total lease to the realtor that found the tenant, for the full term of the lease, and that is paid up front.
Why? Why do we do this?
Most of our properties are commercial buildings, office space, strip malls, etc.
We work a lot with a local realtor, and when we started out, he wanted paid for the entire length of the lease, up front, and since this was "industry standard" we did that. We, like all of you, have tenants that don't make it. Their business changes, or folds or whatever, and they move out. Depending on the circumstance, you cannot always collect for the full lease, as in: you can't get blood from a turnip type of situations. This was extremely prevalent during Covid.
We changed how we do business with realtors. We no longer pay their percentage for the full term of the lease contract - we pay that percentage monthly, to the realtor, for the length of the lease that the tenant actually resides and uses the property. If there are situations we cannot collect from (blood/turnip), there is no more percentage paid to the realtor.
I've heard the arguments: "It's not the realtors fault if you can't keep the tenant happy and in business." Well, depending on circumstances, that might be true, but based on our experience, it isn't something we as the landlords are doing, but rather something the companies themselves are doing to not keep their business viable.
As an example, why should I pay 6% on a five year lease up front to the realtor, when the business folds in a year and half?
I can tell you that your realtors will NOT like this model, at first... but after switching, they receive a regular monthly paycheck which lends to stability and a regular income for them and is more fair for the landlord. I am not saying that realtors don't have value, because they absolutely do, but I'm not seeing why the landlord should pay for something that they do not receive. It works and it has been much better for us. The risk is now equal and our realtor doesn't just throw anyone at us to make a sale because he knows that a viable tenant will net him more than a flakey one.
Maybe it's time to change the "industry standard".