Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

180
Posts
104
Votes
Mike Lowery
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Milwaukee, WI
104
Votes |
180
Posts

Purchasing Property with Seller Carry Back as Equity Instead of Debt

Mike Lowery
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Milwaukee, WI
Posted

Hello BP Community! 

I am sure it has done before and I am not thinking too outside of the box, but in starting to structure syndication deals, it dawned on me that if you could find a seller willing to carry back some capital, you could provide equity instead of debt?

For clarification, I will use an example:

Purchase Price: $1M

Seller Carry Back: $300K

Loan: $700K

Instead of a traditional seller financing deal, where the seller would take a second position to the bank, why not offer them equity stake in the asset?

I understand this is not ideal as most sellers are looking for cash and would not keep equity in an asset just to relinquish operation?

But in the long run, the owner is more than likely cashing out the equity they have built in the property while also continuing to earn cash flow from the asset. Not to mention the equitable position that could be passed down or capitalized upon at disposition. 

Has anyone has experience with this? Pros and Cons? Things to watch out for? Am I crazy?

Thank you for your anticipated input!

Loading replies...