Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Texas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
4
Votes
Patrick Ma
  • Investor
  • Sugar Land, TX
4
Votes |
19
Posts

LLC to hold rental properties in Texas for Solo 401K Investment??

Patrick Ma
  • Investor
  • Sugar Land, TX
Posted

I'm reading that a Solo 401K Trust is already protected from creditors and bankruptcy in Texas. That said, does it protect you in the case of a tenant sueing the owner if the Solo 401K owns the rental property? I'm considering whether I need to create an LLC to hold the rental property on behalf of the Solo 401K trust and like to hear other's opinion. Is this prudent or a wasted layer for Texas rental properties?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,877
Posts
2,535
Votes
Brian Eastman
Pro Member
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
2,535
Votes |
2,877
Posts
Brian Eastman
Pro Member
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Patrick Ma

The Solo 401(k) is separate from you and does insulate you from liability in the event someone sues related to a 401(k) held property.

If the large majority of the Solo 401(k) holdings are the property, then a LLC inside the 401(k) does not necessarily add much benefit. Good quality insurance would be valuable.

If the plan itself has significant other holdings of cash or other non-liability producing assets, then isolating a property with a LLC held by the plan could be beneficial. In that case, a litigant would be going after the LLC, and the plan itself (and other non-LLC assets within the plan) would be shielded.

Loading replies...