Texas Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Patrick Ma's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/852406/1621504458-avatar-patrickm210.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=397x397@115x162/cover=128x128&v=2)
LLC to hold rental properties in Texas for Solo 401K Investment??
I'm reading that a Solo 401K Trust is already protected from creditors and bankruptcy in Texas. That said, does it protect you in the case of a tenant sueing the owner if the Solo 401K owns the rental property? I'm considering whether I need to create an LLC to hold the rental property on behalf of the Solo 401K trust and like to hear other's opinion. Is this prudent or a wasted layer for Texas rental properties?
Most Popular Reply
![Brian Eastman's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/215702/1688431838-avatar-safeguardira.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=403x403@48x48/cover=128x128&v=2)
The Solo 401(k) is separate from you and does insulate you from liability in the event someone sues related to a 401(k) held property.
If the large majority of the Solo 401(k) holdings are the property, then a LLC inside the 401(k) does not necessarily add much benefit. Good quality insurance would be valuable.
If the plan itself has significant other holdings of cash or other non-liability producing assets, then isolating a property with a LLC held by the plan could be beneficial. In that case, a litigant would be going after the LLC, and the plan itself (and other non-LLC assets within the plan) would be shielded.