Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

28
Posts
3
Votes
Michael LeClerc
  • Park City, UT
3
Votes |
28
Posts

Investment Diverification Austin

Michael LeClerc
  • Park City, UT
Posted

Greetings,
Here is a thought that I'd like to throw out there. Its about diversification and cash flow.
When one buys a sf rental for lets say $200,000, and it rents for say $1500/month. After taxes, maintenance and property management one might net $8,000 annually if lucky. Whereas one could invest in businesses where the cash flow could be so much greater. for example, a restaurant that one buys the ongoing business of for the same $200,000 might net $30,000-$50,000 annually. Both ideas have risk, for the houses tenent problems, and damage, vs business failure or underperformance. Both ideas take energy, and while one could hire a property manager for sf rentals, one hires a manager for the business.
Would the eventual asset value of the houses be more than the increased cash flow for the businesses over a 20 year period? I'm not sure it would.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,906
Posts
1,569
Votes
Timothy W.#3 Off Topic Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Viera, FL
1,569
Votes |
4,906
Posts
Timothy W.#3 Off Topic Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Viera, FL
Replied

Michael,
Welcome to the next level of real estate investing; where you rub your eyes and say, "Wait a minute...." ;-) There's a point every new cashflow (aka landlord) investor starts to realize they're worth a million dollars and can't afford a sandwich. Some people compensate for this by landlording and flipping, but despite the fact that both businesses are in real estate you can't escape the reality that one is an equity business while the other is a cash-making business. You can make a living pursuing cash businesses only. There are many people that have done quite well at that. I think you can make a better living by also pursuing an equity business at the same time. You need a place to put that cash you're making and I think the benefits of real estate are great, but this is just one opinion. It doesn't NEED to be real estate and frankly in real estate it doesn't NEED to be a real estate business where you handle tenants. I talked with a guy who was blowing my ROI out of the water by growing wheat on farmland rather than investing that money into apartments.

Tim

Loading replies...