Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
New Member Introductions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago,

User Stats

23
Posts
1
Votes
Tony Thompson
  • Midlothian, VA
1
Votes |
23
Posts

Understanding of "et al"

Tony Thompson
  • Midlothian, VA
Posted

So I've managed to grab 4 appointments this week (excited beyond belief). 3 of those according to the tax assessor's site are owned by "name, et. al." the question is for the contract to be valid are the signatures of the others required, or is the signature of the specifically named individual sufficient?
My lawyer has said "I don't know enough about what you are doing to assist you with this venture" as he hands me back my retainer check back! Any thoughts or opinions are greatly appreciated!
Thanks

Loading replies...