Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

44
Posts
5
Votes
Anurag D.
  • Santa Clara, CA
5
Votes |
44
Posts

Condo (CA-Bay Area) vs SFH (CA-Central Valley) (Investment Prop)

Anurag D.
  • Santa Clara, CA
Posted

Hello Everyone,

> Option# 1:

Condo/Townhome

Location: California - Bay Area (South/ East(Pleasanton)/ North(San Francisco)/ Oakland)

Price: $400-500K ; HOA: <$400

> Option# 2:

Single Family

Location: California - Sacramento/ Fresno/Stockton (Decent School District 7+), (Tier 2 cities in CA)

Price: $400-500K ; HOA: 0 ; Mello-Roos: ~$350

> Plan: Keep the property for 15+ years.

> Assumption:

  • Single Family prices are stable and would rise faster than Condo.
  • Bay-Area property price would rise higher than CA-markets (usually).

QUERY:

It is not possible to determine which option would be a better option:

- in terms of price-appreciation in long-run(10+ years).

- better rent-opportunities.

Please share perspective.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Best…

A

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

118
Posts
90
Votes
Katrina Razavi
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
90
Votes |
118
Posts
Katrina Razavi
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
Replied

As a general rule and given past experience, I always prefer to buy SFR's vs. condo's, but like Justin noted, condos can turn out to be great investments.

My reasons for not liking condos as investments: 

1/ more volatile than SFR market (i.e. look at how condo's in the city of SF are doing right now vs. SFR's)

2/ HOA fees aren't tax deductible and can go up at any point in time, making it a big variable in cash flow

3/ HOA boards are always a mess, lots of restrictions and less control over your property (i.e. many boards disallow Airbnb or STR's and other issues you don't deal w/ when you have your own home).

Given the pandemic, folks are also looking for more space and w/ Sacramento being a growing city and having a foundational job market due to gov't jobs, the SFR would be my vote. But depends on the #'s and your long-term goals.

Good luck!

  • Katrina Razavi
  • Loading replies...