California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
presented by
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
presented by
1031 Exchanges
presented by
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 7 years ago,
California Owner/Builder Fix/Flip
I'm researching what it means to be an Owner/Builder in CALIFORNIA and came across this website:
http://www.cslb.ca.gov/Consumers/Building_Official...
- 1) Owner/builders NEED a contractor license if they "Intend" to sell (no time given) (4 property max yr)
- 2) Owner/builders DON'T NEED a license IF they IMPROVE a property and then complete the work sometime after residing in it for 12 months.
- 3) Owner/builders DON'T NEED a license IF they build a NEW HOUSE and live in for 12 months after (2 per 3 yrs)
It seems like if a landlord wants to improve properties he/she owns, it is ILLEGAL unless
- non-permitted work (like painting, flooring, fences no higher than 6 feet, etc.. I believe)
- have lived in any of those houses for 1yr, or currently living in the property for 1 yr)
The real question I guess, is what is permitted v. non-permitted work RE: local city/county/state codes
Moral of the story for ME: finding a good contractor is as important as finding a good deal.