Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago,

User Stats

6
Posts
2
Votes
Annett Annett
2
Votes |
6
Posts

Rental Property in Palm Springs, CA

Annett Annett
Posted

Hello, new member here. I live in Los Angeles and always wanted a rental property in Palm Springs. I can tell thru the years the restrictions in Coachella valley got stricter and stricter but now I finally accumulated enough cash to buy a property. From what I am seeing only Palm Springs lets you get a STR permit without weird zoning requirements. What caught my eye in their FAQ is that they only let 36 contracts per calendar year. Meaning your property can only be rented 36 times in a year (no limitation on how long per guest). I wanted to get some advice from people who have experience in these areas whether or not this would be worth it. Are there any loopholes around this restriction?

Loading replies...