Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago,

User Stats

285
Posts
67
Votes
Leon Lee
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
67
Votes |
285
Posts

Is 2% rule a good measure for STR

Leon Lee
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Atlanta, GA
Posted

Hi, BP family

I was recently thinking about a good measure on whether it is worthwhile to convert LTR to STR. I asked around and got different answers. Some say that your STR gross income needs to be at least twice as the LTR gross income, and some say 4X. Such measures seem to be a little problematic to me because they depend on how expensive the STR property is. For example, if I spend $1M on a mansion and the market long-term rent is $3000/m. Even if I make $6000/m by converting it to a STR, i.e., 2X of the long-term gross monthly income, I still could go broke.

This makes me think of the 1% rule for LTR, i.e., your monthly gross income needs to be at least 1% of the purchase price to ensure that the property has positive cash flows. In the same nutshell, I wonder whether. I could use the similar rule on the STR: that is, the gross monthly income of the short-term rentals need to be at least 2% of the market value of the property. This measure incorporates the market value of the property in the test and may be applicable in properties with wider ranges of values. Interestingly, from my super small sample size (2) of STR and short operating time, I found that the gross income of the two properties fit 2% rule quite well. To use a $200K property as an example, the following table listed major differences in income and expenses (please correct me if they are way off) for STR and LTR scenarios and ignored those items that are similar (property taxes, mortgages, etc). In this case, suppose the LTR has $0 positive cash flow after incorporating all other expenses, the STR scenario still has $700/m to $1600/m positive cash flow, which seems to be fair compensations for extra hassle and time related to STR.

Any inputs from you experienced STR operators are welcomed!

Thanks
Lee

STR

LTR

Gross Rent

4000 (2%)

1600(0.8%)

Cleaning, supplies, utilities

1200 (30%)

0 (0%)

Management fee (optional)

800 (20%)

160 (10%)

Vacancy

0 (0%)

128 (0.8%)

Remaining (including management fee)

2000

1312

Remaining (WO management fee)

2800

1152

Loading replies...