Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

58
Posts
4
Votes
Sam Abe
  • Palmdale, CA
4
Votes |
58
Posts

How to hold co-signor responsible

Sam Abe
  • Palmdale, CA
Posted

I have a property that was rented to a couple with a co-signor. The couple left but their daughther and son-in-law stayed back and are not paying rent now. 

If we file eviction the case would only include the daughter and her husband as all lawyers say we cant include the original tenants as they have left. 

What is the point of having a co-signor as now the eviction case wont involve any of the initial 3 lease signors. And eviction case cant even claim the lost rent as all lawyers say we have to file 2 seperate cases. One to evict and other to claim monetarty loss. 

Is this how eviction works?

Property in North Hollywood. 

Loading replies...