Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

14
Posts
6
Votes
Aric Yuji Harris
6
Votes |
14
Posts

How to do a Condo Property Regime in Petaluma, CA?

Aric Yuji Harris
Posted

Hello, I'm looking to sell a home with a detached converted carriage house but due to family issues, the converted carriage house cannot be sold. I looked into subdividing the lot as well as implementing a life estate where the buyer would need to accept a life long tenant, but I was then informed about CPR's or Condominium Property Regime's where I can classify the house and carriage house as separate condo units but maintain the same lot. Thus avoiding doing a full lot split.

Does anyone have any experience in such a thing in Petaluma? Do you know the type of attorney I would need and the time needed to carry something like this out?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

  • Aric Yuji Harris
  • Loading replies...