Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

22
Posts
20
Votes
Walt B Philip
20
Votes |
22
Posts

PITI projections vs real after tax income

Walt B Philip
Posted

I'm trying to calculate my expected real profit vs the basic formula and seeing income tax taking a hefty chunk out. Is this right? Can you please correct me where I'm wrong? Simple numbers for sake of conversation below, leaving off CAPEX/vacancies:

Rental property price: 500,000

Down payment: 100,000

Taxes: $14,000 year

PITI: $3,000mo / $36K annual

Rent roll: $5K monthly / $60,000 annual

Expected profit: $24,000

But in reality the tax rate of 24% will be applied towards taxable income. Deductions applied:

Taxes: $10,000

Interest: $12,000

Depreciation: $10,000 (optimistically)

Thus income tax is: 0.24 x 28,000 = $6,700

Real profit: rent roll - PITI - income tax

SO: 60,000 - 36,000 - 6,700 = 17,300

So ROI goes from calculated 24% to 17%

Does anyone else see a flaw in this reasoning? 17% is still very good but the income tax is quite a drag. Is this the right general way to understand things?

I sincerely appreciate whatever insight you have.

Loading replies...