Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Walt B Philip

Walt B Philip has started 6 posts and replied 21 times.

I'm trying to calculate my expected real profit vs the basic formula and seeing income tax taking a hefty chunk out. Is this right? Can you please correct me where I'm wrong? Simple numbers for sake of conversation below, leaving off CAPEX/vacancies:

Rental property price: 500,000

Down payment: 100,000

Taxes: $14,000 year

PITI: $3,000mo / $36K annual

Rent roll: $5K monthly / $60,000 annual

Expected profit: $24,000

But in reality the tax rate of 24% will be applied towards taxable income. Deductions applied:

Taxes: $10,000

Interest: $12,000

Depreciation: $10,000 (optimistically)

Thus income tax is: 0.24 x 28,000 = $6,700

Real profit: rent roll - PITI - income tax

SO: 60,000 - 36,000 - 6,700 = 17,300

So ROI goes from calculated 24% to 17%

Does anyone else see a flaw in this reasoning? 17% is still very good but the income tax is quite a drag. Is this the right general way to understand things?

I sincerely appreciate whatever insight you have.

It started 40 years ago when western countries started outsourcing manufacturing there and those countries started getting wealthier.  If anything, they artificially hold their currency down so they get a favorable trade advantage from us.  Weird though because a lower dollar would dramatically help out export sales, so it never made much sense to that trump would want a strong dollar.  The strongest and most stable currencies in countries like Switzerland benefit their economies but ours is a bit more complex.

Originally posted by @Marlon Lacayo:

@Carlos Ptriawan 

Sure, the fed can keep printing dollars and keep interest rates low. That's basically how they're playing "weekend at bernies" with the corpse of the stock market. Right now prices are going up in housing, yes, but my understanding is it's largely a supply/demand imbalance. Increasing asset values today isn't a marker by itself that the market is healthy.

More importantly, unemployment and mortgage default are getting VERY high. Similar to 2007, people are becoming less and less able to pay their mortgages. Then it was driven by predatory lending and subprime home buyers. Today it's because the lock down and Covid has potentially nuked a lot of employment.

If enough people start defaulting and getting foreclosed on, the supply of housing is going to shoot up and costs would come down. The people on forebearance are going to get called on their mortgage payments starting in March 2021 and then we will see who's actually able to pay and who gets evicted and foreclosed on.

 I can’t help but wonder about this as well.  The government can protect people for a while but it can’t change the nature of market economics.  Eventually something has to give.  The folks blithely proclaiming “time in the market” have apparently never seen a stock go to zero or a neighborhood stay unprofitable for half a century.  Just as quickly as the government can make safe investments like CDs entirely unprofitable in order to incentivize risk assets, they can reverse that trend if it’s deemed a useful policy tool.  Maybe it’s just me because I’m new to real estate but I’m coming from a financial markets background and I have to be honest: folks in real estate seem to think they’re immune to market economics to a much greater extent than I’ve seen in any other sector (including oil and how’s THAT working out for them? LOL)


There’s no nice way to say it: the last group of politicians did everything they could to concentrate wealth at the expense of the overall health of the economy and it’s not even fully known how many people won’t be getting jobs in 2021 and how many properties stand to be foreclosed.  Stats like this should be CLOSELY tracked at the top of the house but they tried to brush reality under the rug with programs like PPP that ultimately just created lots of zombie companies that rest assured will die (and make even more people unemployed).  Now, for better or for worse, we are faced with the incoming administration openly saying they want to make housing more affordable which can only mean they aren’t interested in pumping asset prices up....because let’s be real, it’s not creating jobs.  Maybe it means some tax scheme to help middle class buyers but more likely they’ll withdraw price support because again....it’s not really benefitting anyone except folks who already own houses.

Something simple like a tax incentive to corporates to sell off a lot of the SFH rentals they picked up after 2008 could knock prices down across the board considering they picked up tens of thousands at a time. Or the government can end the interest rate deduction for institutional investors and make SFH rentals entirely unprofitable to PE shops, thus forcing a firesale and 30% decreases. Lower real estate prices can be engineered quite easlitu without a recession. And this is just one set of scenarios but you can see how quickly things can change. If they can enforce a nationwide eviction moratorium, they can verifiably do this.

In the big picture, despite the highly disingenuous real estate agent talk of “low inventory”, the overal population has not surpassed the relative number of homes available to the extent needed to justify such price increases....it’s just HOW the existing homes are being used on a wide scale.  I’m curious to see what happens in the next 3-6 months.

Post: Self owned management company - taxes

Walt B PhilipPosted
  • Posts 22
  • Votes 20
Originally posted by @Bob Norton:

@Walt B Philip Yes, you can setup a separate property management company and charge your rentals a property management fee that you deduct on your rental income.  But . . . you will then have to claim the property management income on your Schedule C (or if you setup an S-Corp, then your W-2) and you will then pay a higher tax rate on that income, because you will also be paying self-employment taxes.

So, you'd be saving taxes at the lower rental rate, while paying taxes at the higher self-employment rates.  Not the best tax strategy, if you want to save taxes.

I recommend that if you manage your own properties, that you simply do that as a landlord and not have to pay any self-employment taxes.

 Hi Bob, thanks for helping me understand, very much appreciated 

Post: Self owned management company - taxes

Walt B PhilipPosted
  • Posts 22
  • Votes 20

I’m in process of learning how rental properties tax deductions work.  One item I see is properly management.


If I manage my own property, can I form a LLC as a property manager with myself as the employee? In essence I'd be paying myself to do the maintenance I'd otherwise do for free...then claim it as a tax deduction.. Does that fly?

Thanks guys but not following.  Let me ask it differently: is the rent that tenants pay to me taxable?

Just getting started with rental property investing and I'm wondering if the cash flow generated above and beyond all expenses (PITI etc) is taxable as income in NJ.

Numbers to illustrate the question: PITI is $3000/month and rent is $4000, so cash flow is $1000. Is that 1000 taxable?

Post: NJ cash flow investing

Walt B PhilipPosted
  • Posts 22
  • Votes 20

Looking for alternatives to NJ (where I live) because real estate has become too expensive to find decent cash flow and prices are going up faster than rents ever can.  What are some good alternatives?  PA?  Overseas?  

Post: When Will The RE Market Crash?

Walt B PhilipPosted
  • Posts 22
  • Votes 20
Originally posted by @Moises R Cosme:

@Walt B Philip I do not see inflation as a driver, particularly if employment trends hold.

ETF price inflation (aka “bubble”) is different than core inflation


https://www.bloomberg.com/news...

Originally posted by @Travis M.:
Originally posted by @Walt B Philip:
Originally posted by @Travis M.:

@Wale Lawal

I think the Democrat’s self stated goal of printing as much money as possible will do what we have already seen - increase the value of assets.

 How’s that any different from the last 8 months of money printing and 4 years of aggressively calling for lower rates by the republicans?  Seems both parties are doing exactly the same thing, yes?  

 Did I imply otherwise?

 That’s the inference I drew, so trying to see if there’s a continuity.  Assuming more of the same, I should be buying everything in sight knowing a year from now it will be another 20% higher.