Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

10
Posts
1
Votes

Refinance riddle - $200/month in savings not enough?

Gregory Coppola
Posted

I'm currently house-hacking a triplex in Philadelphia. I want to refinance to a lower rate, and thus lower my monthly mortgage payments. The loan officer is telling me financially it doesn't make sense for me to refinance because I'd only be saving $200/month (that sounds great to me), and when he includes closing costs/FHA fees it would take 69 months for me to recoup the money I'd be spending on closing. I tried to explain that I'd be saving $70k over the life of the 30 year mortgage, but he rebutted in saying the government states it doesn't make sense to refinance unless you can recoup the closing costs in 48 months or less. I simply don't understand this logic, and he did a poor job at explaining to me (he then began to get frustrated and lose his patience when I asked him to explain the logic behind it). Because the way I see it, by lowering my monthly mortgage payment I'm able to increase cash flow. Am I missing something? I was hoping someone could possibly shed some light on this.

Just to be clear, he told me he would put the loan through and go forward with an appraisal at my request, but he doesn't recommend I do so. 

Thanks guys!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,372
Posts
19,407
Votes
Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
  • Plymouth, MI
19,407
Votes |
13,372
Posts
Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
  • Plymouth, MI
Replied
Originally posted by @Gregory Coppola:
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
Originally posted by @Gregory Coppola:

I plan to have the house for 10+ years. But no, closing costs won't be out of pocket, they're tied in to the mortgage. 

 So wait, there's nothing out of pocket at this closing, and you're getting $200/month higher cash flow?  If that's the case, then your mortgage broker is nuts.  Since the cost of the closing is in the mortgage, and the cost of the mortgage is $200 less per month, there is no recovery time.

And here I was thinking I'M the nuts one.....

You still might be,...but you're right about this one.  LOL

It's not about how much something  costs, as much as how it's paid for.  In this case, since both the savings and the "paid for" are included in the mortgage payment.  If the increase in the mortgage payment due to this refi is less than the decrease gained in the mortgage payment, then you would be losing money if you didn't do this.

If the cost of the refi (fees, c.c.,etc...) comes out of pocket up front, then you would have to calculate how long it took you to recover it from the net savings gained from the reduced mortgage payment,...and the broker would be correct.

Loading replies...