Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Joe Villeneuve

Joe Villeneuve has started 0 posts and replied 12840 times.

Post: Why does cash flow matter

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Dominic Joseph Jean:
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:

Cash flow doesn't generate wealth. It allows the REI to hold a property while that property gains in equity from appreciation, which is how you ultimately gain wealth.

How does the equity build wealth over time?

Equity from appreciation is cash that's frozen.  For each dollar the property grows in value, the equity grows that same dollar.  Here's where the disconnect comes.  Many REI think that it ends there, that just because the equity grows, your profits also grow.  That's not true.  Equity is cash, but it's frozen cash.  It's useless when it remains frozen in the property.  In reality, the equity is what you are paying for that property.  As the equity grows, so does the cost of the property to you.

Post: Analyzing a property

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Daniel Lang:

@Matthew Becker Not over asking, over the appraised value* (which I received after the offer was submitted and I was lining up financing). I'm trying to build a portfolio that will generate cashflow for me. Financially, I'm not taking out a hard money loan.  My point in asking is how do I avoid this mistake in the first place going forward. 

Learn how to analyze the market the property is in.  Properties are pieces of a market.

Post: Analyzing a property

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Daniel Lang:

Hey all, I am just getting started and in my first deal I offered more than the property appraised for.  What should I be looking at when trying to consider an appropriate offer (especially if I can't see the property since I'm investing out of state)?

First, the only reason why you would offer more than a property is worth, is if you are focused on the property, and not the deal.  WRONG ANSWER!!!

Post: Why does cash flow matter

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418

Cash flow doesn't generate wealth. It allows the REI to hold a property while that property gains in equity from appreciation, which is how you ultimately gain wealth.

Post: 15yr Projection Breakdown of 3 Key Strategies

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Drew Sygit:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Drew Sygit:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:

There is actually a big difference.

The reason is that you cut out the middleman and their margin. So if you buy a turnkey property (they buy, fix up, rent and sell) for 150k you're looking at 1200/month rent, versus 150k directly through a broker can get you 1400/month. 


 There will be no difference in the rent - unless the TurnKey provider threw in a desparate/bad tenant to get the higher rental amount.

With a TurnKey provider, you'll pay more for a property that they have rehabbed, versus hiring your own crews to rehab something.

Yes correct. So in the analysis I put the purchase price the same for 1st and 2nd strategy but the ratio of purchase price to rent is different since the turnkey is rehabbed and tenanted, and so you're paying for their premium. That's why the rent is different.

In other words, if the turnkey provider is selling the rehabbed property for 150k, they're giving it to you tenanted at $1200/month (they price them based on rent), but if you buy a property for 150k direct then you can most likely rent it for $1400/month (since you would likely get a more attractive property [bigger, slightly better location, etc] since there is no middle man). Of course that's assuming you do your research and get a good deal, in all cases. 

With that in mind, are you seeing any assumptions that look off to you, with any of those strategies?

 Market rent is market rent!

So, how is a TurnKey provider going to get higher rent than the market?

What's really wrong with your #1 & #2 comparisons is you assume you'll pay the same price for a property via broker or TurnKey.
- How will the Turnkey provider profit from doing this?
Reality is TurnKey providers price at the top of the market - often even higher. They try to get investors to focus on the ROI numbers they promote, not comparable sales.

I am not assuming I would pay the same price for the same property. That's what I explained in my previous reply. The properties are not the same and that's why the rent is different. 

I'll give you a specific example of 2 properties to illustrate. 

Property #1 is a turnkey, fully rehabbed 2/1 1000sq ft house in a location that will rent for $1200. The turnkey company will sell this for 150k.

Property #2 is a 3/1 1200sq ft house in the same location that I would buy through a broker. I would buy it also for roughly the same price (it will be in good condition but may require some small fixes for a tenant), but it's bigger and has an extra bedroom so it will rent for $1400.

I could have also ran this model by assuming that I would get the same type of property as the turnkey, but for $125k and would rent for $1200 as the turnkey would. Same idea. 

With that in mind, do you feel that the rest of the numbers make sense?

How can you do a comparison between strategies, if you are not using the same property in your comparison.  That's trying to compare apples to grapes.

Post: 15yr Projection Breakdown of 3 Key Strategies

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:
Quote from @Drew Sygit:

@Rafael Ro Why are your numbers different for options #1 and #2?

The only real difference is when you start collecting rent after purchase.

How have you weighed this against the probability of tenant nonperformance?

REALITY: not much of a difference.

It's because he doesn't understand the numbers, which is why he's trying to form a "one size fits all" set of percentages.  He ends up with a "one size fits all" set of percentages, after he goes through, and bypasses the actual numbers.  This is just another example of trying to take a shortcut...something we find way too often in this day of the need for instant gratification.
Joe, the reason I created this breakdown was to evaluate these different strategies long term. It's my way of processing. The reason I posted it here was specifically to get feedback on the assumptions I made. 

If you say the assumptions are good - great. And if you say that they're incorrect - that's good too. My goal here is to learn and to understand. 

I did try to create a "one size fits all" type of setup in order to compare the strategies. Obviously not all properties are going to be $150k -- some may be 125k and others may be 175k.. but they would average around there. And the rates will of course fluctuate over the years.. but if they go up or down then that would apply to all. Same with the other numbers. They would all be the same "type" of property. 

Some of these numbers are not going to be completely accurate - I understand. But if my "assumptions" make sense, then they should get fairly close, on average. 

This is not meant to be for 1 property - it's means to apply to scale. 

If not this, then what's a better way to accurately model a long term projection? 

I've been stashing up cash for a little while in a HYSA and I really want to make a move, but I want to do it gradually instead of going all in. So I'm trying to evaluate the best method to do this.. I feel like right now is one of the hardest times to find deals, but I still want to start asap and go slow and steady, with a long term plan. Thus the projections and the model. 

Another approach would be to just keep my eyes open for all sorts of deals of any type, and to try and go for it when a great one comes up.. I understand that this can make sense since every deal is different. But in this case I'm trying to zone in on a specific type of deal so that I can focus on that and try to specialize in it. 

You're one of the most experienced people on this forum, and maybe you've seen this one too many times... but if this is not the way then what is? Isn't focusing always better?

What you are doing makes sense, only because of your newness to REI.  I understand what you are trying to do, but I will tell you never do it again.  It's a waste of time, will lead you nowhere, and only confuse you at the end.

In REI it IS important to have focus, and it IS based on accumulating numbers to base decisions on.  The problem is, the way you are doing it is wrong.  You are starting out with a set of numbers based on average, to accumulate data that is also an average.  This is one of the definitions of the word "guessing".  This will never lead you to factual numbers because nowhere in  your analysis formula, do you have any specific facts...that are not ranges of numbers.
REI analysis isn't based on ranges as a starting point to accumulate numbers that are specific.  It's the other way around.  You start out with specific numbers, from specific micro-markets, then use those numbers to develop specific "tight" ranges.
Tell you what.  It's very hard to discuss this going back and forth in this format.  PM me if you're interested, and I can walk you through it.

Post: 15yr Projection Breakdown of 3 Key Strategies

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Drew Sygit:

@Rafael Ro Why are your numbers different for options #1 and #2?

The only real difference is when you start collecting rent after purchase.

How have you weighed this against the probability of tenant nonperformance?

REALITY: not much of a difference.

It's because he doesn't understand the numbers, which is why he's trying to form a "one size fits all" set of percentages.  He ends up with a "one size fits all" set of percentages, after he goes through, and bypasses the actual numbers.  This is just another example of trying to take a shortcut...something we find way too often in this day of the need for instant gratification.

Post: 15yr Projection Breakdown of 3 Key Strategies

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:

I got about 1/4 of the way down and realized you were just putting in guesses for numbers based on percentages of things with no identification of how you arrived at those numbers. You appeared to be using arbitrary percentages. How you came up with those percentages, you really didn't say. In other words the basis for any analysis you did here ultimately was just guessing. REI is nothing like that.

RE analysis is based on actual numbers using dollar signs, not percentages.  The specific market you find properties in defines those numbers, and they are NOT specific to a general size.  They are specific to a specific market, actually micro-market.  Properties don't define the market, the market defines the properties.  Properties a pieces of the market they are in.

The strategy you use should be based on the market.  Never decide on a strategy ahead of time.  Let the market decide what strategy works in that market.  This means you need to learn how to analyze markets.


Thank you Joe. The numbers are not really arbitrary, and they are based on a specific market - Memphis.

The reason I used percentages for most items was so that I would be able to do as close to an apples to apples calculation. For example, I used 5.9% of purchase price per year for mortgage, which looks random as a way to calculate a loan payment, but if you look at a 150k property with 25% down and a 6.85% interest rate, then your principal and interest would be $737 x 12 months = $8844, which is 5.9% of 150k. So it works out. 

I used arbitrary and small numbers for rent increases and appreciation because the same applies to each of those strategies so I didn't want it to affect things too much. 

And then I used maintenance, tenancy based on what I'm reading makes sense for long term, and a little bit of padding. 

That said, I can totally be off in any of those assumptions - that's what they ultimately are.. guesses.. but they are guesses based on reading a lot, researching, talking to people, and adding a padding that I thought would be "fair" for the items that are not actually factual (ie. insurance/loan/etc). 

This is the reason I made this post. I look at these numbers as somewhat pessimistic -- that's why I'm showing negative cashflow on the first strategy, which is obviously presented as a positive cashflow from several leading turnkey firms. Not saying that they're lying or anything. Just that this was my effort to get as close to realistic as I could. 

Please let me know what looks wrong - I would welcome that. 
  

If you know what the actual numbers are in dollars, then why are you using percentages at the end?  It makes no sense.  Just stick with the dollars.
Also, not all properties in a market are the same.  If you are using what you might think is one market, it may be more than one.  You may have overlapping markets too.
Just stop using percentages.  Work with dollars.  You can use defined percentages, like taxes, because they are a product of a specific percentage applied to property value.  You can use interest rate, because it is specific as defined by the lender, but that's about it.  Everything else should be in dollars, and those two percentages I mentioned above produce dollars,...as in mortgage payment and taxes.  If you calculated the mortgage payment already, then using a percentage in your analysis, you're going backwards.

That's fair. The reason behind the percentages was mainly in order to create a model that I could feed into ChatGPT, which helped me create these projections. 

It would be very difficult for me to keep track of dollar amounts but as %s I was able to have ChatGPT adjust those values as needed... particularly as it relates to items that were calculated based on rent.

I hear what you're saying though. My goal here is to get more feedback like this - especially as it relates to my assumptions. 

I also understand that everything ultimately depends on every individual situation. It's easy to create a model assuming that all is equal, but when done at scale I'm sure there will be winners and losers. So with this I'm just trying to create a decent average point of view really. 

Percentages are going backwards.  There are no percentages that you can use to develop a "model".  The market develops it, and it is very specific to dollars.  Stop using percentages.  It doesn't work like that.
For instance, rents are not computed from a percentage, they are a results of rental comps.  In a specific geographical micro-market, all properties that are between 1000 - 1200 sq ft, might rent for $1100+/-.  The "+/-" isn't based on the high or low end of the sq ft range, it's based on the differences in quality, or finishes, or the specific location within that micro-market.  Those same houses 2 miles away, could be a different micro-market, and rent for $1300.  Same size properties, different micro-market.  Neither market has any impact on the other.

Post: 15yr Projection Breakdown of 3 Key Strategies

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418
Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:

I got about 1/4 of the way down and realized you were just putting in guesses for numbers based on percentages of things with no identification of how you arrived at those numbers. You appeared to be using arbitrary percentages. How you came up with those percentages, you really didn't say. In other words the basis for any analysis you did here ultimately was just guessing. REI is nothing like that.

RE analysis is based on actual numbers using dollar signs, not percentages.  The specific market you find properties in defines those numbers, and they are NOT specific to a general size.  They are specific to a specific market, actually micro-market.  Properties don't define the market, the market defines the properties.  Properties a pieces of the market they are in.

The strategy you use should be based on the market.  Never decide on a strategy ahead of time.  Let the market decide what strategy works in that market.  This means you need to learn how to analyze markets.


Thank you Joe. The numbers are not really arbitrary, and they are based on a specific market - Memphis.

The reason I used percentages for most items was so that I would be able to do as close to an apples to apples calculation. For example, I used 5.9% of purchase price per year for mortgage, which looks random as a way to calculate a loan payment, but if you look at a 150k property with 25% down and a 6.85% interest rate, then your principal and interest would be $737 x 12 months = $8844, which is 5.9% of 150k. So it works out. 

I used arbitrary and small numbers for rent increases and appreciation because the same applies to each of those strategies so I didn't want it to affect things too much. 

And then I used maintenance, tenancy based on what I'm reading makes sense for long term, and a little bit of padding. 

That said, I can totally be off in any of those assumptions - that's what they ultimately are.. guesses.. but they are guesses based on reading a lot, researching, talking to people, and adding a padding that I thought would be "fair" for the items that are not actually factual (ie. insurance/loan/etc). 

This is the reason I made this post. I look at these numbers as somewhat pessimistic -- that's why I'm showing negative cashflow on the first strategy, which is obviously presented as a positive cashflow from several leading turnkey firms. Not saying that they're lying or anything. Just that this was my effort to get as close to realistic as I could. 

Please let me know what looks wrong - I would welcome that. 
  

If you know what the actual numbers are in dollars, then why are you using percentages at the end?  It makes no sense.  Just stick with the dollars.
Also, not all properties in a market are the same.  If you are using what you might think is one market, it may be more than one.  You may have overlapping markets too.
Just stop using percentages.  Work with dollars.  You can use defined percentages, like taxes, because they are a product of a specific percentage applied to property value.  You can use interest rate, because it is specific as defined by the lender, but that's about it.  Everything else should be in dollars, and those two percentages I mentioned above produce dollars,...as in mortgage payment and taxes.  If you calculated the mortgage payment already, then using a percentage in your analysis, you're going backwards.

Post: 15yr Projection Breakdown of 3 Key Strategies

Joe Villeneuve
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Plymouth, MI
  • Posts 13,385
  • Votes 19,418

I got about 1/4 of the way down and realized you were just putting in guesses for numbers based on percentages of things with no identification of how you arrived at those numbers. You appeared to be using arbitrary percentages. How you came up with those percentages, you really didn't say. In other words the basis for any analysis you did here ultimately was just guessing. REI is nothing like that.

RE analysis is based on actual numbers using dollar signs, not percentages.  The specific market you find properties in defines those numbers, and they are NOT specific to a general size.  They are specific to a specific market, actually micro-market.  Properties don't define the market, the market defines the properties.  Properties a pieces of the market they are in.

The strategy you use should be based on the market.  Never decide on a strategy ahead of time.  Let the market decide what strategy works in that market.  This means you need to learn how to analyze markets.