Quote from @Rafael Ro:
Quote from @Joe Villeneuve:
Quote from @Drew Sygit:
@Rafael Ro Why are your numbers different for options #1 and #2?
The only real difference is when you start collecting rent after purchase.
How have you weighed this against the probability of tenant nonperformance?
REALITY: not much of a difference.
It's because he doesn't understand the numbers, which is why he's trying to form a "one size fits all" set of percentages. He ends up with a "one size fits all" set of percentages, after he goes through, and bypasses the actual numbers. This is just another example of trying to take a shortcut...something we find way too often in this day of the need for instant gratification.
Joe, the reason I created this breakdown was to evaluate these different strategies long term. It's my way of processing. The reason I posted it here was specifically to get feedback on the assumptions I made.
If you say the assumptions are good - great. And if you say that they're incorrect - that's good too. My goal here is to learn and to understand.
I did try to create a "one size fits all" type of setup in order to compare the strategies. Obviously not all properties are going to be $150k -- some may be 125k and others may be 175k.. but they would average around there. And the rates will of course fluctuate over the years.. but if they go up or down then that would apply to all. Same with the other numbers. They would all be the same "type" of property.
Some of these numbers are not going to be completely accurate - I understand. But if my "assumptions" make sense, then they should get fairly close, on average.
This is not meant to be for 1 property - it's means to apply to scale.
If not this, then what's a better way to accurately model a long term projection?
I've been stashing up cash for a little while in a HYSA and I really want to make a move, but I want to do it gradually instead of going all in. So I'm trying to evaluate the best method to do this.. I feel like right now is one of the hardest times to find deals, but I still want to start asap and go slow and steady, with a long term plan. Thus the projections and the model.
Another approach would be to just keep my eyes open for all sorts of deals of any type, and to try and go for it when a great one comes up.. I understand that this can make sense since every deal is different. But in this case I'm trying to zone in on a specific type of deal so that I can focus on that and try to specialize in it.
You're one of the most experienced people on this forum, and maybe you've seen this one too many times... but if this is not the way then what is? Isn't focusing always better?
What you are doing makes sense, only because of your newness to REI. I understand what you are trying to do, but I will tell you never do it again. It's a waste of time, will lead you nowhere, and only confuse you at the end.
In REI it IS important to have focus, and it IS based on accumulating numbers to base decisions on. The problem is, the way you are doing it is wrong. You are starting out with a set of numbers based on average, to accumulate data that is also an average. This is one of the definitions of the word "guessing". This will never lead you to factual numbers because nowhere in your analysis formula, do you have any specific facts...that are not ranges of numbers.
REI analysis isn't based on ranges as a starting point to accumulate numbers that are specific. It's the other way around. You start out with specific numbers, from specific micro-markets, then use those numbers to develop specific "tight" ranges.
Tell you what. It's very hard to discuss this going back and forth in this format. PM me if you're interested, and I can walk you through it.