Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,451
Posts
462
Votes
Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
462
Votes |
1,451
Posts

Who "TYPICALLY" pays for irrigation of a SFR lawn?

Sam Leon
  • Investor
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posted

Location is Florida.

Lease does not stipulate who pays for the watering of the yards.

During the initial lease negotiation, the topic did come up. The realtor said we both contribute. I pay for someone to mow the lawn twice a month ($80 a month) and the tenant pays for the irrigation as part of HIS water bill. He seems agreeable at the time, but nothing was written into the lease.

We also discussed who's responsibility it is to put up hurricane shutters in the event of a hurricane approaching. We agreed I (landlord) would do it but at my discretion. In other words if I don't think a storm is threatening enough to do it I don't have to, if he worries he could do it himself. That wasn't written into the lease either.

After two months he complained of high water bill. I looked into it and yes it is high because the city charges on a bracket. First 3000 gallons $1.72 per 1000 gal, but once over 20,000 gal they charge $10 per 1000 gal and there are multiple tiers in between. I put in new sod so initially needed more water and set the sprinklers to water every day. My fault and will reimburse him for it.

However, I said let me dial back on the sprinklers to once a week instead of once a day, and that should only cost an additional $40 each month on your end. I am paying $80 to mow the lawn twice a month. Fair? He said no, I don't want to pay a dime for watering the lawn.

Any suggestion on a resolution?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,116
Posts
5,171
Votes
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
5,171
Votes |
5,116
Posts
Kyle J.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Northern, CA
Replied

It's up to you and the tenant, but no matter what - you have to get your agreement written down. In other words, it needs to be in the lease. Since you didn't do that, you might want to do an addendum to get it written down now (better late than never).

As for what is "typical", in my area the tenant usually pays for the water. I don't pay for the water at any of my properties. I'm not using it, so why should I pay for it?

However, I know that some landlords will pay for the water because in some areas (mine included) a lien could be placed on the property if the tenant fails to make the payments. Although in this scenario, the cost of the water is usually built into the monthly rent payment so that it almost ends up a wash each month. If you do that, you should still have it in writing and specify how much water is considered normal or that they are allowed before an overage charge is added. You don't want them running a car wash at the property or letting all their friends use their water because the landlord is paying for it. There has to be a limit.

Loading replies...