Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago,

User Stats

26
Posts
6
Votes
Sarah Jukes
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Santa Cruz
6
Votes |
26
Posts

Non 3rd party tenant background check!?

Sarah Jukes
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Santa Cruz
Posted

This is our first rental. I asked the applicants to apply via RentSpree. They are saying they are not happy using a 3rd party system for the application and background check. Because of hacking!?

They prefer paper application. However I still need to go online to do their background check. And still need their SSN so their concerns don’t make sense.

They ‘seem’ like great applicants, good jobs, rented 7 yrs landlord now selling, etc.

Is there a non 3rd party background check!!!?! 

Are they being ridiculous? What’s the best suggestion to alleviate their fears!

Thanks!!

Loading replies...