Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

11
Posts
5
Votes
Cameron Sylvester
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Saint Petersburg
5
Votes |
11
Posts

1 100k rental or 2 homes on the same property for 200k

Cameron Sylvester
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Saint Petersburg
Posted

Is it better to have 1 100,000 dollar rental or 2 homes on the same lot not a duplex for 200,000 dollars?

I am looking to buy a rental before the end of the year and am trying to decide if I should go after a single family home for around 100K (115- 95) (known as property "A" or get a single family home that has two units on it home with a carriage house around 200k (190 - 215( known as property "B").

The "A" home would get around 1000 a month in rent and the "B" would get about 1800 together in rent.

The "A" home is in a little worse area but is growing in popularity. The "B" home is in a good part of town but not a ton of growth. Taxes would be a little higher with "B". 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,460
Posts
1,594
Votes
Cassi Justiz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Edmond, OK
1,594
Votes |
1,460
Posts
Cassi Justiz
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Edmond, OK
Replied

I would stick with one home for 100,000. Less potential for drama and you still have an extra 100,000 to do it again. BUT only if you can get a solid tenant pool in the area of property "A". If it's still hard to find reputable tenants to rent out the property because it's in a bad area, then it's going to be a risk tolerance question.

A potential upside would be that A home could increase rent/value if the area continues to gain popularity and desirability. 

Loading replies...