Resident Managers and How Much to Charge for Rent

Resident Managers and How Much to Charge for Rent

Member since 2008 · 3 posts · 0 votes

Hello All:

I own several multi-family rental properties and have always paid the Resident Manager a salary, including a free apartment.

I have recently acquired a new business partner and we recently purchased a property with 48 units. My partner does not want to give the Manager a free apartment. He wants to charge the Manager full market rent.

I did some research and discovered that the California Industrial Welfare Commission says that a Manager may be charged up to 2/3 the fair market value of the unit but, in no event, shall it be more than $381.20 per month for a single employee or $563.90 for a management team (e.g., husband and wife).

After further research, I discovered that there are actually two (2) exceptions to this rule, which are as follows:

1. Manager must be paid in accordance with state minimum wage requirements for all hours worked. The Owner may deduct up to $381.20 per month as a lodging credit from the Manager's salary, which counts as payment in full for the monthly rent.

2. Manager is paid in accordance with state minimum wage requirements for all hours worked. The Owner pays the Manager by check for all hours worked, and the Manager pays the Owner by a separate check for 2/3 of the fair market value for the apartment.

Does anyone know which of these exceptions is generally followed? I want to ensure that we follow the correct procedure before hiring our new Manager.

Any information that you can share would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!!

0Reply
45 views

5 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Member since 2008 · 251 posts · 7 votes
    20y

    Are you talking about this law:

    http://www.dir.ca.gov/t8/11000.html

    I'm no lawyer, and I don't know anything about California law, but my amateur read of that code makes me think they aren't limiting what rent can be charged, just how much of free rent can be used as credit towards the minimum wage requirement. That is, if you give a tenant manager an $800/month room for free, only $381.20 of that counts towards the minimum wage requirement. That is, you could only deduct his/her wages by a total of $381.20 (assuming you are paying minimum wage). I'm not sure I understand how you conclude from that law that you can't charge the full $800/month rent and then just pay minimum wage for hours worked. Otherwise, there would just be too much incentive to hire a manager who didn't live there. [I think it is trying to prevent owners from giving free lodging and then reporting an inflated "fair market rent" as a way to circumvent the minimum wage laws]

  • Member since 2008 · 3 posts · 0 votes
    20y

    Thanks for the reply.

    I concluded that you cannot charge full market rent because I read the entire IWC Wage Order #5-2001 (scroll down to Section 10, Meals and Lodging). http://www.dir.ca.gov/IWC/IWCArticle5.html

    The link you provided is a recap of this Wage Order.

    The following is listed under the listing of amounts to be credited against minimum wage:

    (E) If, as a condition of employment, the employee must live at the place of employment or occupy quarters owned or under the control of the employer, then the employer may not charge rent in excess of the values listed herein.

    Another property owner that I know provided me with the two scenarios that I listed in my original posting. This is why I am not sure what to do at this point.

  • Member since 2008 · 251 posts · 7 votes
    20y

    Interesting. I don't know what to say. Why not just make living there optional? Does the manager really have to live there? Could he/she do the job if he lived down the street? Lots of places don't have on-site managers. If he/she doesn't want to pay full rent, let him live somewhere else. Then you could rent the apartment to someone else at full price, if that's what you want. I guess it comes down to how much the place rents for regularly and how important it is make living there a requirement of employment.

  • Member since 2008 · 3 posts · 0 votes
    20y

    Thanks for the response, but California law states that any property with over 16 units must have an employee/manager living on site. As such, living on site is a condition of employment when you are offering a resident manager a job, which further locks me in to IWC Wage Order #5.

  • Member since 2008 · 1 post · 0 votes
    19y

    The Guy who... thinks that Apartment Managers are the backbone of the business. It's the manager who determines the quality of the person and overall health of YOUR investment because good tenants means payment of rent and a successful building. It's your investment. You get what you pay for.

    I have never charged a manager rent. If anything it's an important perk to attract a quality manager. Free rent, free internet, free cable, free utilities, and send them on a weeks paid vacation to Hawaii after 10 years.

    You don't even want to know where I sent one after 20 years.

    www.aaoc.com has an Instruction sheet employee information for apartment owners, it says if the rental value is not being used to meet minimum wage requirements, and is not used as a credit against wages, there is no upper dollar limit other than the 2/3 rule.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.