Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Please log in or sign up for a free account to continue.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: N/A N/A

N/A N/A has started 1 posts and replied 3 times.

Thanks for the response, but California law states that any property with over 16 units must have an employee/manager living on site. As such, living on site is a condition of employment when you are offering a resident manager a job, which further locks me in to IWC Wage Order #5.

Thanks for the reply.

I concluded that you cannot charge full market rent because I read the entire IWC Wage Order #5-2001 (scroll down to Section 10, Meals and Lodging). http://www.dir.ca.gov/IWC/IWCArticle5.html

The link you provided is a recap of this Wage Order.

The following is listed under the listing of amounts to be credited against minimum wage:

(E) If, as a condition of employment, the employee must live at the place of employment or occupy quarters owned or under the control of the employer, then the employer may not charge rent in excess of the values listed herein.

Another property owner that I know provided me with the two scenarios that I listed in my original posting. This is why I am not sure what to do at this point.

Hello All:

I own several multi-family rental properties and have always paid the Resident Manager a salary, including a free apartment.

I have recently acquired a new business partner and we recently purchased a property with 48 units. My partner does not want to give the Manager a free apartment. He wants to charge the Manager full market rent.

I did some research and discovered that the California Industrial Welfare Commission says that a Manager may be charged up to 2/3 the fair market value of the unit but, in no event, shall it be more than $381.20 per month for a single employee or $563.90 for a management team (e.g., husband and wife).

After further research, I discovered that there are actually two (2) exceptions to this rule, which are as follows:

1. Manager must be paid in accordance with state minimum wage requirements for all hours worked. The Owner may deduct up to $381.20 per month as a lodging credit from the Manager's salary, which counts as payment in full for the monthly rent.

2. Manager is paid in accordance with state minimum wage requirements for all hours worked. The Owner pays the Manager by check for all hours worked, and the Manager pays the Owner by a separate check for 2/3 of the fair market value for the apartment.

Does anyone know which of these exceptions is generally followed? I want to ensure that we follow the correct procedure before hiring our new Manager.

Any information that you can share would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!!