Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

40
Posts
29
Votes
Emily Sulliban
  • Methuen, MA
29
Votes |
40
Posts

50% Rule- Is it Really a Rule?

Emily Sulliban
  • Methuen, MA
Posted

I've been reading on the 50% rule for calculating viability on a potential rental income property:
Gross monthly rent
-(minus)50% for operating expenses
______________________________(equals)
NOI(Net Operating Income)
-(minus)mortgage payment
______________________________(equals)
Cash flow (positive or negative)

My question is: Does the 50% rule ever become.. the 65% rule? Or is the 50% rule an actual rule and it's safe to assume that operating expenses will always stay at 50% or less?

Are there any landlords that can tell me all of their actual operating expenses (other than loan/mortgage payments)? I understand utilities, taxes, and landlord insurance.. the solid monthly fees that I know will come every month. The other fees, such as maintenance, legal fees, and eviction costs don't seem like solid monthly expenses... does the 50% rule account for these fees that will eventually pop up, but at an incalculable point in time?

Thanks,
Emily

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,906
Posts
1,396
Votes
Mitch Kronowit
  • SFR Investor
  • Orange County, CA
1,396
Votes |
1,906
Posts
Mitch Kronowit
  • SFR Investor
  • Orange County, CA
Replied
Originally posted by Jon Holdman:
I will give you an "anti-rule".

Cash flow = Rent - PITI

I see this one used on a daily basis. Every deal some wholesaler shows me uses this rule to claim "it cash flows".


Ok, simply in the interest of clearing some things up:

Speaking strictly from an accounting perspective, the "cash-flow" of a property on any given month is the rent check minus any checks YOU write. For example, imagine a house you manage yourself rents for $1,000/month with a mortgage (P&I only, non-escrowed) of $600. Not bad for a few months, right? The cash-flow is INDEED $400 a month, i.e., you received a rent check for $1,000 and only wrote one, to the lender, for $600. So for this month, cash-flow WAS Rent minus P&I.

However, what happens when the tax bill installment of $1,200 comes in? Wow, super cash-flow negative that month ($1,000 - $600 - $1,200 = - $800)!!! And a few months later, dang, a water pipe bursts and there is no such thing as a cheap plumber. Next year, a two-month vacancy. (This is why reserves are SOOOO important!)

So, what "newbies" should understand is this 50% "rule" amortizes those BIG expenses over the long-term to come up with an "average" operating cost for the property in order to compute an average monthly cash-flow. IOW, a property that "cash-flows" most of the year actually may not be profitable to own!

Topic locked

Loading replies...