Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

68
Posts
28
Votes
Gregory B.
  • Brooklyn, NY
28
Votes |
68
Posts

Landlords will pay tenants to leave

Gregory B.
  • Brooklyn, NY
Posted
After reading through these forums I've realized that the difference between how people approach real estate is Day and night. I'm in NY, more specifically NYC, and see advice given that is down right shocking on how to approach LT issues. In NYC decisions are made based on business/economic terms, rather then the emotion of many on these forums. I tend to see a lot of responses to question on here stating that people need to act like a business, but then proceed to tell people that they need to show the tenants who's boss and how they are being taken advantage of instead of weighing the economics from every angle. Maybe the market isn't saturated with tenants and it will take 6 months to relent the premises plus turnover costs, so evicting a recidivist last payer is not the right option? But, I will constantly see situations on here where people on these forums demean others about being taken advantage of by the tenant and how they need to show them you are a business and won't be taken advantage of. Or, they strive to make a black mark on the renters history no matter how little the breach is. These answers show that they are not thinking with a clear business mind. With that said do you think that all rentas should be managed by a third party who is not emotionally connected to the property? And in reference to the title of this post, with half of all rentals in NYC being rent regulated, it is common for LL's to Buyout tenants who are defaulting on the lease or breaking the law. Now the business purpose behind this is the LL then can take certain increases in rent and in the right circumstances deregulate the apartment. LLs will pay anywhere from several thousand dollars and free rent to millions for apartments to do this. I feel like many LLs will be shocked to find this out and would refuse just based on many of the responses on this forum, even if that is the correct economic decision to make. What are your thoughts? Pardon my ramble and typos, this was written on my phone.

Loading replies...