Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Quote from @Patrick M.:
Why did you keep responding? In particular, why did you keep responding with an apology as if you are doing something wrong? You continued to engage so they continued to look for a weak spot. Once they switched the animal from a pet to a service animal, you were legally forced to respond and now you may end up renting to these master manipulators. They played you like a fiddle.
I rent in a vastly different market than yours. My state is run very differently for multi-family landlords than others. My state funds many organizations that pretend to be tenants. They inquire about Section 8, children and number of them, service dogs, etc. What you see as being played I see as operating within that paradigm. I will never be accused of saying something verbally which is contrary to the law in my state and the only evidence which will ever be presented is that of pleasant landlord conducting his business.
Once I informed them of the service animal all communication ceased, so I do not understand the fiddle? Additionally- they would have to demonstrate such a claim.
If I was in a market which was "pro-landlord" and did not have every branch of my government: legislative, executive and judicial, looking to impair my business, then perhaps I would do things differently.
But one thing is for sure, if I did operate in such "landlord friendly" market I would not presume to tell a fellow, successful, landlord in a more restrictive market how to conduct himself. I operate successfully in a state many investors won't even consider...
fiddle, yeesh.