General Landlording & Rental Properties
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/236bc/236bcfb8b7739f9aedd52a26c53ca65a579a2e6e" alt="Rashad Nelson's profile image"
Baltimore City - tenants failure to pay water utility bills
Hello fellow BP members,
I'm not looking for answers, but I am curious if anyone with rentals in Baltimore City has dealt with the following situation:
Here's the scenario - I have a SFH rental in Baltimore City with a long time tenant. She's subsidized through Section 8, partially. Still paying her rent, but as of late, she's falling behind on paying her water bill. Not sure why. I informed her repeatedly if she's having financial trouble, then approach Section 8 on re-adjusting her rent portion until she has it firmly under control. Per the lease she's accountable for paying her water utility bills.
Now, here's where it's my problem. Typically (in a place that makes sense), if someone fails to pay a bill, any bill, then the service is cut off by the service provider. That absence of service is more than enough incentive to get past due bills paid to restore service, especially if it's water. Everyone needs running water where they reside. However, Baltimore City doesn't cut water service for delinquent water bills, but simply places a tax lien on the property once the delinquent bill is over $1,000 over due and after failing to pay three consecutive delinquent water bills. I hear NYC does the same, not sure why, maybe to save costs on continually cutting off and turning back on water for multitudes of properties. In any case, it would certainly prevent further investment on my end on buying additional properties in Baltimore.
To avoid any issues with the city, I paid the tenant's bill and informed Section 8. My argument is that if the water service is never discontinued, then there's zero incentive for any tenant to pay their water bills in Baltimore City, at least on time.
Again, I'm just curious if anyone experienced this.
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2c3b/b2c3b3b2ae4bc279728c178a2f42a41a682cd902" alt="Ian Barnes's profile image"
If you think the returns are high in Baltimore because its easy, think again. The city doesn't care if your having tenant problems. If your the owner its your responsibility to pay the water. Add the amount into your rent. If section 8 doesn't care, then your screwed until the lease is over. Picking the right tenant is probably the most important thing in Baltimore, period, again, no one cares about your money. All you are is tax revenue for the city.