Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

56
Posts
10
Votes
Nate Hananger
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
10
Votes |
56
Posts

Roommate Question: 1 moving out, 1 staying

Nate Hananger
  • Investor
  • Las Vegas, NV
Posted

Property is in California.

Tenant A was living in the 2bed/2bath apartment first. Tenant B was added to the lease under the condition that if either tenant wanted to be removed, they would first be required to find a replacement tenant in order to avoid putting the financial burden on the other roommate. The property management company has a tenant release form that must be signed by all parties before anyone is removed/added to prove the transition was mutually agreed upon. 

Tenant B is now attempting to bypass that condition with little or no effort to find a replacement. They have not vacated the property yet and no move-out date has been mentioned by either tenant. 

Is it possible for Tenant A to make a case with the claim that Tenant B is neglecting their responsibility to find a replacement tenant? If Tenant A has evidence the lease is still active, but Tenant B has no evidence Tenant A agreed to assume 100% of the rent, shouldn't Tenant B remain accountable until a replacement is found?   

If not, what is the best option Tenant A has to defend themselves against Tenant B abandoning their agreement? 

Loading replies...