Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

70
Posts
30
Votes
Ishviyan D.
  • Investor
  • Columbus, OH
30
Votes |
70
Posts

Downside to having multiple different PM's?

Ishviyan D.
  • Investor
  • Columbus, OH
Posted
I'm hoping to build out my portfolio in the coming years and may face situations where I purchase properties from different turnkey providers in the same market. Given that each turnkey provider has their own established PM, whether in-house or external, is there any downside to having my properties managed by 2-3 different PM's in the same market? Or is it better to consolidate and bring all properties under one PM? I am speaking purely from an operational / efficiency perspective assuming all PM's in question are equally effective and capable. Curious if anyone out there has any opinions on this. Thanks.

Loading replies...