Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,884
Posts
2,318
Votes
Wesley W.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • The Vampire State
2,318
Votes |
1,884
Posts

Assigned parking lane "violator"

Wesley W.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • The Vampire State
Posted

Hi all,

There was a thread several days ago regarding a different issue with assigned parking, so I thought I would keep with a variation on the theme.

We've got a small multi-family building (4 unit) that has just two off-street parking lanes - each assigned to one of the two larger units in the building.

I am having an issue with a tenant (who is assigned one of the spaces) using BOTH spaces.  The unit assigned to the other space is currently vacant, so I'm guessing their strategy was "'tis better to ask for forgiveness than permission" and helped themselves to both spaces.  I told them this was not acceptable, as I would be using that space (for turnover and renovation) on a daily basis.

Well, after my request not to use the space not assigned to them (verbally, then memorialized via text), I once again showed up this morning with both spots filled by this same tenant.

She is mostly a good tenant (inherited, we purchased last August), but as with most tenants she sometimes looks to see where "the line" is by testing my rules in minor ways.

The parking assignments are addressed in her lease (MTM), but what I am struggling with is the part where I state, "if you don't comply with my request, then this <consequence> will occur."  What would that next step be if this were your property?

If I send her a "notice to cure" she can keep moving her car when I request.  It seems kind of draconian (and unnecessarily costly via turnover on my end) to terminate her lease over this, so I am trying to anticipate what would be the next logical step if she doesn't comply after my formal letter to her.  I don't suppose I could "fine" her without a lease addendum she agrees to, either.

I'm hoping someone has some suggestions that would yield the intended response without escalating the situation too much by playing the "termination" card.  

What do you think?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

8
Posts
5
Votes
Steve Portock
  • Investor
  • Alpharetta, GA
5
Votes |
8
Posts
Steve Portock
  • Investor
  • Alpharetta, GA
Replied

Tow her car next time, tell her she has her assigned spot, and if another car is in there that does not belong it will be towed. Set up with a towing company and just do it. Remember its a business, and once you have told someone the consequences, it falls on them if they don't comply. 

Loading replies...