Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
5
Votes
Brian Tisler
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Oshkosh, WI
5
Votes |
19
Posts

Month to Month too risky?

Brian Tisler
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Oshkosh, WI
Posted

Hi everyone- I am a new investor and have an appointment to look at an upper/lower duplex.  The numbers appear to workout at there current rent, but both of the current tenants are currently month to month.  Is it too risky to purchase a property where both tenants are month to month?  Can I require they sign a new 12-month lease or they have to move so I can get a tenant in that will sign a 12-month lease or do I have to let them continue on a month to month basis since that is what they were doing?

Thank you in advance for any/all advice!

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
3,246
Votes |
4,456
Posts
Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
Replied

I only did M2M and loved them.  I'd leave it alone.

The thing is, if a tenant really wants out of a lease, they will move or they will make your life miserable until you let them move.  

What a lot of them will do, is start complaining about habitability issues, so you have to let them out of the lease.  And a lot of times, they won't first just ask if you will let them out of the lease.  So all of a sudden, you're getting calls about rats and mold and who knows what, and you're thinking what the heck is going on?  Well, they want out of the lease, and they think just asking won't work.

If a tenant wants to move, I think it's better to let them.  And the most important reason for having a M2M agreement, is that you also can just give them 30 days notice to leave, if you don't want them there any longer.

And, with M2M, you only have to give them 30 days notice of a rent increase (check your local laws) or any change in rules you want, too.  You want to change the parking rules, or late fees, or smoking, or anything - 30 days notice.

And, tenants can't hold you hostage ever, knowing you can't kick them out until the end of the lease - or at least without major hassle.  I think it also keeps tenants better behaved, when they know you can kick them out with 30 - 60 days notice.

So, I'd leave it alone.  And send them 30 days notice of any rules you want implemented - in a friendly way, of course :-)

Loading replies...