Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

142
Posts
52
Votes
Justin Frye
  • Investor
  • Columbus, OH
52
Votes |
142
Posts

Which is a better starter investment 30k rental or 80-100k?

Justin Frye
  • Investor
  • Columbus, OH
Posted

I've been reading and hearing a lot lately on how it's the quality of houses you buy, not the quantity. Ben lebovich is one who is a firm believer in not buying 30k houses to rent. Is there really a difference in the price of the house your buying to rent, if your still positively cash flowing every month and your still at a positive cap rate Or ROI in the end.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,683
Posts
5,886
Votes
Scott Trench
  • President of BiggerPockets
  • Denver, CO
5,886
Votes |
2,683
Posts
Scott Trench
  • President of BiggerPockets
  • Denver, CO
Replied

I think that the fundamental question you are asking here is what matters in real estate investment - ROI, or cash flow? It's the age old question of appreciation vs cash flow - which matters more?

The answer is, it depends. I believe that for many people thinking about real estate, the keys are cash flow first, then ROI as they scale. The reason I think this is because it's hard to scale while working a full-time job. Once you have that first $5, $10, or even $20K in stable monthly cash flow, and have the resulting freedom to direct your time as you choose, more cash flow at the expense of greater appreciation potential seems kind of pointless, right?

That said, when you buy $30K houses, Ben is of course correct in the vast majority of cases. There is a high chance that there is a great reason the house is $30K. It's because it is going to do nothing beyond (at best) provide you with cash flow on your investment. It's likely not going to increase dramatically in value, attract quality tenants, be a stable, low-maintenance asset, or provide any of the real, scalable benefits of real estate investing to your life.

Personally, I choose to buy assets that produce reasonable, but not incredible cash flow, but have plenty of potential for appreciation. And I buy them in cities and neighborhoods that are growing, not declining. If I don't firmly believe that the property's location will be more desirable in 30 years than it is today, then I feel that the property won't serve either my cash flow or ROI goals.

Loading replies...