Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

70
Posts
7
Votes
Dana R.
  • San Clemente, CA
7
Votes |
70
Posts

Deducting Security Deposit for non- broken Blinds?

Dana R.
  • San Clemente, CA
Posted

The tenant that moved out had a baby and I guess they must have tried to baby proof the home. I understand that that dangling cords are a concern, but what they did to the cord blinds was ridiculous:

They knotted and tied up all the blinds in all those various knots. I tried untangling them but its like a Gordonian knot and I can't untangle them. 

Can I deduct from the security deposit the cost to replace these blinds even if they still work because I can't untangle the cords? After talking to a employee at Home Depot, it sounds like it'd be cheaper to just buy new blinds than to replace the cords themselves.

Has anybody dealt with a problem like this before? Is there any secret or tip as how to untangle these cords?

Most Popular Reply

Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
3,246
Votes |
4,456
Posts
Account Closed
  • San Jose, CA
Replied

You could charge them for them, and I think it would be fair.

The only problem in CA, would be if they fought it, and you didn't include them in the initial inspection list.  

However, you can charge them for things that were not obvious during your initial inspection.

Why don't you charge them for them and see if they fight it?  If they do, they will most likely then send you a demand letter before taking you to small claims court.  If they do that, you could then just reimburse them, before going to court.

And by the way, blinds that don't work - are broken :-)

Loading replies...