Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

174
Posts
39
Votes
Justin C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NW, PA
39
Votes |
174
Posts

Correct verbiage for turning down applicants

Justin C.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • NW, PA
Posted

Hello BP, I've had a busy week showing our SFH and accepting rental applications. I have 3 applications... 1 solid one that I would love to have and who would be perfect. The other two I honestly dont feel would be the best for the house. One guy has 2 German Shepherds; its a relatively small place with a small yard, he travels and would have a roomate stay with him, in a band and has a lot of musical equipment, etc... and the other couple asked me about house parties, smoking, and how many people I would allow to say in the house at any given time. Needless to say, I'm not thrilled with either of the last two. I am only going to run the 1st applicant as shes my primary candidate. Assuming she passes, do I need to run the other two in order to not discriminate or can I simply say I've found a tenant and the home is no longer available. Then return their money. Or do I even need to return their money? I'm probably over thinking this but if you could provide some guidance I would be very much appreciative.

Thanks in advance

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17
Posts
6
Votes
Evans Marcie
  • Cartersville, GA
6
Votes |
17
Posts
Evans Marcie
  • Cartersville, GA
Replied

Hi Justin! I've worked multifamily Property Management for about 20 years. It is super sensitive to fair housing laws, however in that case you only can take one applicant at a time - not at all like SFH. If you have less than 10 rentals, you can simply say you have approved another applicant and give them back their application money if you haven't run their credit and lost any funds. No explanation is necessary. That being said, mass quantities of people (probably over occupancy standards in your area) or having two large dogs - neither are protected classes. Therefore you wouldn't be discriminating. The key is consistency - if you rent to the other people and they have two large dogs - then you aren't remaining consistent, and other questions may arise. If either party presses for a reason, you can flat out tell them your standards are no pets, and only 2 guests per person - to dissuade them from asking any other questions. They will know why and likely go elsewhere with no conflict. Hope it helps!!

Loading replies...