Rose bushes: A liability

[Joe Butcher]

My rental property has three rose bushes. They look nice and I think add a little curb appeal. There is one in the front and two in the backyard.

When trimming them the other day I realized just how thorny they were.

I dont have a tenant in there yet, but was wondering: If my tenants have kids and they fall into the bushes or hurt themselves in some way on the thorns, can I be facing possible legal action? Should I get rid of them?

Is there something I should/could put in the lease regarding such things?

Thanks

[Marcia Maynard]

Is it the "Yellow Rose of Texas" you are talking about? We are in Vancouver Washington, just north of the "Rose City" of Portland Oregon. Roses are a natural part of landscaping around here. We have had rental property for 19 years. Rose bushes have never been a problem. Our city police actually recommend landscaping with thorny bushes under windows to deter crime.

Roses bushes can be easily managed, it's the blackberry bushes that get out of hand. Poisonous plants are the ones that could lead to real trouble. Identify and remove any poisonous plants on your property as well as any invasive species.

As to your questions about the rose bushes: Legal action is highly unlikely; on what basis, a scratch? No need to get rid of the rose bushes unless you don't like them. They can be an asset as good foundation plants. Put in your lease who's responsible for taking care of the landscaping and define it further if you feel you need to.