Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

155
Posts
13
Votes
Aaron Xie
  • Investor
  • Southern California
13
Votes |
155
Posts

Is it normal for a management company to withhold repaid rent?

Aaron Xie
  • Investor
  • Southern California
Posted

Good morning, BP fellows.

I have a rental property in Indianapolis managed by a big PM company. They tell me that the tenant has paid three months rent in advance. However, they have to withhold the extra two months' rent and transfer when the months come.

This scenario is not covered in the contract. So I am wondering if this is the industry standard? Thanks in advance.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,129
Posts
2,640
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,640
Votes |
3,129
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

This is what my PM is doing right now as well. The reason is that that rental income hasn't been "earned" yet. If you were in control of the place and managing yourself, you would need to be escrowing those funds in a separate account and then only "receiving" them as the individual months passed. It protects the tenant from ending up in a situation where the property is unusable to them for a period of time and they needed to have that money repaid. So if they paid it out right now and then next month the home burned down you would need to reimburse them those funds. It is much easier to make sure that happens correctly when the control of those funds is still in the hands of the PM who would be dealing with the tenant side of things in a situation like that.

Loading replies...