Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago,

User Stats

39
Posts
17
Votes
Leslie Beia
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Austin TX
17
Votes |
39
Posts

Buying A House With Tenants In Place

Leslie Beia
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Austin TX
Posted

Hi y'all! Hoping the creative minds of BP'ers can help me with some info and strategy.

I just found a property for sale on the MLS- the EXACT house I've been looking for for months to house hack. At a low enough price point for its condition and location that I know there's gonna be a catch.

A little background: I own 2 commercially-funded properties and one I paid for in cash, and I've never taken out an FHA loan. Unfortunately, I can't qualify for one for a few years as I work to bring my Covid-decimated self-employed career back to life. I've decided to settle in Austin, TX. I have rented here for a year, been studying the market, and started making offers on off-market houses I can fund commercially, hold as a rental, then refinance into conventional to live in once I qualify.

Recently, though, I decided to partner with another investor who would be able to co-sign for me. We could get the cheap loan, hold for 2 years as a slow flip, then sell after at least 2 years to avoid capital gains. And I'd have a home! So this great home pops up, needing just the right amount of cosmetic reno to be perfect, at a mysteriously low price point. So, turns out, the current renters have a lease in place for another year. I'm trying to understand what is actually true/legal about that situation, and how it might affect demand for the house and my plans as well.

Am I right to assume that any investor coming along looking to commercially fund this home, even straight into a 30-year rental mortgage, would not be able to do so without losing money every month? $450k purchase price, current rent is $2000 which is way below market- I'm paying $2150 for a way less great house and I'm very jealous!! It could easily be $2500. So that makes me wonder what sort of laws are in place in this situation- I do STR's and have no idea what long-term rentals are like. Does a new landlord have to keep the lease in place as is?

If I had to buy this house with commercial funding, the whole deal goes a bit sideways, because it's way more expensive money, and while the MLS price is VERY good, it's less good without the FHA. I can't imagine covering a new loan with current interest rates at that rental price.

What are some creative ideas y'all have to acquire it, and what are your thoughts, as long-term rental investors, on this kind of deal? The house is great and in a sweet neighborhood and will be a safe investment. Is it a big turn off to inherit tenants? No biggie? I appreciate your thoughts, thanks!

  • Leslie Beia
  • Loading replies...