Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Personal Finance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 10 years ago,

User Stats

319
Posts
167
Votes
David C.
  • Real Estate Professional
  • Mechanicsburg, PA
167
Votes |
319
Posts

Survivorship Bias

David C.
  • Real Estate Professional
  • Mechanicsburg, PA
Posted

Many people are familiar with 'survivorship bias' when it comes to mutual fund investing, the basics are this:  a fund company may start many funds over its lifetime with different strategies.  The ones that do poorly fail to attract enough money to stay open, or are closed when failure is acknowledged.  Those closed funds are rarely included when the fund company, or mutual funds in general are evaluated.  So the same fund company, if they started 10 funds, 3 of them managed an average 15% return, and 7 of them managed 1% returns, but they closed 5 of those 7.  They are left with 5 funds, 3 with 15% and 2 with 1%, and then they come up with 'average performance' using only those 5.

I'm curious about 'survivorship bias' in real estate investing.  Specifically, can we analyze the data on the bigger pockets message boards to get any idea about it?  The amount of users on here seems to keep growing, so: are we nearing 'big data'? where the data does not have to be perfect to come to some conclusions?

Can the guys who run the site mine the old 'new member posts' to see how many realestate hopefuls actually stick around and post?  How about 'my first flip' posts, how many people announce the start of their first project on here, but then never come back?

The successful people on here have strong track records, but I'm afraid at times that it is guru-esque: the failures disappear, so we're only left with the successes.  How many lives are being destroyed by the perception that 'its easy' or 'all it takes is hard work' or 'house prices are low and interest rates are low, you can't go wrong' or 'real estate is way better than the stock market' ?

Anecdotal stories of success are only told by the winners, so following this post with a lot of personal stories of your own successes does not add to the discussion.  Where's the data?  A similar post by Dave Krulac about most real estate investors only owning a single property hinted to there being a disconnect between the perception that there are many people out there building small real estate empires vs. maybe the truth that there are many people out there building tiny real estate investments that they overpaid for and run poorly.

Just pondering if we have enough data on these boards to come up with anything that fosters discussion.

Loading replies...