Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

23
Posts
4
Votes
Bob Jones
  • Baltimore, MD
4
Votes |
23
Posts

A basic question about reviewing judgments

Bob Jones
  • Baltimore, MD
Posted

Hi,

I have a question about judgments. I'm hoping someone can clarify something. 

Sometimes, people have common names. When this is the case, a judgment search may reveal possible judgments against them. The title company now needs to determine whether the judgment attaches to the property. In this situation, there are a few things you can do. 

If the possible judgment is against someone with the same name as the seller, you can contact the judgment holder and verify that the SSN's aren't the same. If the judgment was against a previous owner, you're not going to have their SSN. But, the seller will hopefully have a title insurance policy from when they purchased the property. Your title company will feel comfortable insuring the transaction, safe in the knowledge that the previous title insurance policy can be used to pay off any unreleased prior judgments. 

If the seller didn't get title insurance, your title company can at least contact the prior title company and ask them how they cleared the judgment. They may be able to provide the prior owner's SSN to your title company, thus allowing them to clear the judgment. 

But, what if the seller didn't get title insurance and didn't use a title company when they purchased the property? Let's say the seller was dumb and paid cash for a property without ensuring that there were no title defects. Now, and a judgment search reveals a possible unexpired judgment against a previous owner with a common name. 

This is where my knowledge ends. What do you do in that situation? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,467
Posts
3,417
Votes
Tom Gimer
  • DMV
3,417
Votes |
3,467
Posts
Tom Gimer
  • DMV
Replied

It’s 12 years in MD unless renewed (and I’m not referring to State tax liens which never expire, but I’m sure you knew that).

No title policy means no LOI and no coverage under any applicable mutual indemnity agreement between insurers... so coverage is out and potential liability is on you.

Easiest clear is connection to the address. If the prior owner never lived at the address where the complaint was served but someone else with a different SSN did, you should be good. You need software to do this correctly. We use Accurint. You should be able to easily identify the true judgment debtor (as well as prior owner) and clear the title issue in a matter of minutes.

If you are not in a position to use appropriate skip tracing software, you are not doing this correctly and should be outsourcing this.

  • Tom Gimer
business profile image
Eastern Title & Settlement
4.9 stars
14 Reviews

Loading replies...