Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 5 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a2f5/0a2f5e9146afaf9247012d371311f686e0e2e6bd" alt="William Coet's profile image"
Force Majeure and Property Taxes
Most Popular Reply
Force majeure, from what I recall, is about the inability to complete a contract. Taxes aren't contracts. So, I think the concept can't be applied successfully there.
My problem with people using this argument, is that they're not only saying they can't fulfill their contract, but they're going beyond then just ending the contract. They're expecting to still get everything they wanted from the other party - without having to give what they agreed to give. Getting to stay as a tenant, without having to pay any rent.
I don't see this succeeding in court. They may get a stay of execution, but they'll owe the money.
My crystal ball sees bankruptcy attorneys rubbing their hands with glee.