Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

11
Posts
1
Votes
Jason Kim
1
Votes |
11
Posts

Seller undisclosed information

Jason Kim
Posted

We recently purchased a home in the Plano, Texas area. However several large issues have come up that were not disclosed to us during the process. Does texas allow for the home owner to give back the house and recoup all monies invested into the property? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

887
Posts
758
Votes
Jerel Ehlert
  • Attorney
  • Austin, TX
758
Votes |
887
Posts
Jerel Ehlert
  • Attorney
  • Austin, TX
Replied

To answer your question: there is no "give back" mechanism for real estate.  Your option is to sue if the seller won't cure on their own.

There's a statutory "seller's disclosure" form that you are supposed to get at or before close.  Even then, the seller can only disclose conditions of which they are aware.  If they are unaware, and don't disclose, no liability.  The hardest part of this type of case is proving knowledge.

The next part is determining if a recovery is possible.  The most extreme remedy you asked about is rescission - the court undoes the contract and attempts to put each side back to where they were as if neither entered into the contract.  It's rare, messy, and courts dislike it because it can't be done well. 

Most likely remedy is "out-of-pocket" damages.  Say you bought the house for $100K because in the seller represented that it was worth $100K with the disclosures.  In reality, evidence shows that it was really worth $80K because of $20K in defects the seller knew about but failed to disclose.  In addition to the $20K in actual (monetary) damages, there's $5K in consequential damages (additional expenses for the longer rehab).  And if it goes to trial, you might get awarded attorney's fees based on breach of contract.  On average, expect $8-15K (or more).

So...assuming you can prove all this, and win on all counts at trial - Can you collect $40K from the seller?  I just made up numbers on damages, but you get the point.  You might end up with a judgment you may never collect on.

What happens if you sue and don't get a recovery?  You could end up getting a judgment against you for their attorney's fees.
 

  • Jerel Ehlert
  • Loading replies...