Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5c8c/e5c8ccd5ae1464b9d2d65d866fcec228b8567397" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 13 years ago on . Most recent reply
Buying a property with a county lien recorded against buyer...
Two buyers are on the purchase contract for a short sale.
The plan was to take title under solely buyer #1.
Because of the short sale approvals, title has to be taken by buyer #2 also.
Buyer #2 has a county lien recorded against him by a creditor.
Options:
a) Write an addendum and tell the two lenders that buyer #2 is being removed as a buyer. This means waiting X amount of time to revise the approvals.
b) Can the two buyers take title as "tenants in common" with buyer #1 taking 99% and buyer #2 taking 1%? This would mean that buyer #2 legally has a 1% ownership in the property. In effect, this means that the creditors can only come after a 1% share of the property, so they cannot touch buyer #1's share of 99%. Is this correct? Or can they go after buyer #1's share?
The lien is for 48k. The property value will be about 475k.