Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

273
Posts
43
Votes
Herm M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • NorCal, CA
43
Votes |
273
Posts

Buying a property with a county lien recorded against buyer...

Herm M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • NorCal, CA
Posted

Two buyers are on the purchase contract for a short sale.

The plan was to take title under solely buyer #1.

Because of the short sale approvals, title has to be taken by buyer #2 also.

Buyer #2 has a county lien recorded against him by a creditor.

Options:

a) Write an addendum and tell the two lenders that buyer #2 is being removed as a buyer. This means waiting X amount of time to revise the approvals.

b) Can the two buyers take title as "tenants in common" with buyer #1 taking 99% and buyer #2 taking 1%? This would mean that buyer #2 legally has a 1% ownership in the property. In effect, this means that the creditors can only come after a 1% share of the property, so they cannot touch buyer #1's share of 99%. Is this correct? Or can they go after buyer #1's share?

The lien is for 48k. The property value will be about 475k.

  • Herm M.
  • Loading replies...