Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago,

User Stats

37
Posts
18
Votes
Benjamin Richards
  • Investor
  • Nashua, NH
18
Votes |
37
Posts

Expenses and deductions this year

Benjamin Richards
  • Investor
  • Nashua, NH
Posted

I've used TurboTax to do my taxes for several years now. Once the property basis is entered it's very easy.

I have six rental properties, and two of them showed a loss on paper for 2018. The portfolio is net profitable for the year. But in the two net loss properties, when I enter an expense it is actually DECREASING my total refund. So right now (haven't submitted it yet) I'm not claiming insurance or PMI on them because it lowers my refund.

This doesn't pass the sanity check. We have too high an earned income to write off losses but it makes no sense to pay MORE tax for losing money. Has anyone else encountered this?

Loading replies...