Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

504
Posts
411
Votes
Brian Bradley
  • Attorney
  • Wilsonville, OR
411
Votes |
504
Posts

California Investors Prepare to Pay, UNLESS …

Brian Bradley
  • Attorney
  • Wilsonville, OR
Posted

The cold hard truth is that if you are a CA resident and invest in real estate and own or plan to own multiple investment properties, and you set up an LLC to hold that asset, ANY state that you own property in and any state that you incorporate your company in, even if outside the State of CA, you will have to pay CA Franchise Taxes on it. Another cold hard truth is that if you create separate LLCs for each of those assets, you will be paying maintenance tax and franchise tax’s on EACH of those LLCs. Eating into your cashflow. Another cold hard truth is that if you are a CA resident, and create a Series LLC, in another State, CA will still charge you a franchise tax on EACH child series you create. The more children "series" you add, thats another $800 franchise tax to the State of CA. Again, more cash flow loss. 

HOWEVER, here is how you can legally work around and limit the CA Franchise Tax as a Real Estate Investor who wants the asset protection benefit of creating child series to place each asset in. Its is called the Delaware Statutory Trust Act 12 Del.C. section 3801 (1988). We will call the the (DST) to make it simple.

The benefits of the DST as a Asset Protection system, and particularly for those CA investors is that you can Series out your properties into child series like with Series LLCs, without paying the $800 Franchise Tax for each child series. The (DST)  is a Business Trust, and allows for the Series structure like protection of a Series LLC.

Again, this is not an investment DST for in institutional investing, but rather a Business Trust DST, and to keep that classification of a trust by the IRS, it must maintain strict compliance or the asset protection structure will collapse. This is where working with your team CPA and Lawyer are a must. There are lots of other purposes of DST. Some use for 1031 exchange's, some use as an investment tool to as accredited investors in institutional investments, etc etc. This is not what this forum is about. This is about the DST for Asset Protection as a trust asset holding company.

Some of the code sections regulating the DST are:

12 Del.C. 380; IRC Section 301.7701-4(a); 

Senate Bill No. 355, 66 Del. Laws Ch. 279 (1988); 

IRC Section 301.7701-4(a);

California's Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) section 23101; 

California law, specifically Public Law 86-272. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

221
Posts
160
Votes
Matt Ward
  • Specialist
  • San Francisco Bay Area
160
Votes |
221
Posts
Matt Ward
  • Specialist
  • San Francisco Bay Area
Replied

@Brian Bradley seems like you are dramatizing the CA tax liability a bit. While it is steeper than other states, in the bigger picture, it's just $800/yr per LLC....

Loading replies...