Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 18 years ago,

User Stats

1,970
Posts
1,324
Votes
Bill Exeter
Pro Member
#2 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary
  • San Diego, CA
1,324
Votes |
1,970
Posts

California's Mandatory 3 1/3% Withholding Changing 1/1/07

Bill Exeter
Pro Member
#2 1031 Exchanges Contributor
  • 1031 Exchange Qualified Intermediary
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

California Assembly Bill AB 2962 was approved and signed into law by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on September 22, 2006.

California's current income tax withholding law enacted in 2002 and effective January 1, 2003 under Governor Davis requires a mandatory income tax withholding requirement of 3 1/3% based on the gross sales price on the disposition (sale) of real property under certain circumstances.

The problem with California's current income tax withholding law is that the calculation of the mandatory withholding requirement of 3 1/3% is based on the taxpayer's gross sales price and bears absolutely no relationship to the taxpayer's actual capital gain income tax liability. It actually causes over-withholding for many taxpayers.

Assembly Bill AB 2962 amends Sections 18662 and 18668 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code with regards to the mandatory withholding requirements on the disposition (sale) of real estate by certain taxpayers. It is designed to reduce the problem of over-withholding by allowing taxpayers to elect an alternate method for calculating the withholding amount instead of the current 3 1/3% based on the taxpayer's gross sales price.

Taxpayers will be able to choose a withholding amount based on the maximum income tax rate for individuals or corporations applicable to the actual capital gain on the disposition (sale) of their real property. This solution should eliminate most of the California withholding problems that we have seen day in and day out.

Taxpayers will be required to complete a certification under penalty of perjury to the buyer or REEP (Real Estate Escrow Person, including but not limited to attorney, escrow officer or qualified intermediary) to elect this withholding method.

Feel free to email me if you are interested in reading the California Franchise Tax Board's Analysis of Amended Bill and the Revised Analysis on Assembly Bill AB 2962.

Assembly Bill AB 2962 is effective for dispositions (sales) of California real property closing on or after January 1, 2007.

  • Bill Exeter