Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd643/bd64383acce85f9d3f87521285752e501b3b3aea" alt="Rick Jones's profile image"
How to classify mixed-use property on Sched. E
I'm wondering how to classify my mixed-use property on schedule E. It has 6 units, 5 residential and 1 commercial and naturally it would be advantageous if I could classify the property as residential and be able to depreciate over 27.5 years vs 39 years.
By unit count the property 83% residential and 17% commercial, by sq footage the property is 67% Residential and 33% commercial. By income, the property is 62% residential and 38% commercial.
So BP how would you classify this? Any creative ideas like splitting the property into 2 separate properties and depreciating them in that manner? Any suggestions or advice is appreciated!
Most Popular Reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58ab2/58ab2c80df50e1865521203565e30bfcb634bf2a" alt="Michael Plaks's profile image"
- Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
- Houston, TX
- 5,985
- Votes |
- 5,113
- Posts
Definition of residential is 80% of the rents comes from dwelling units - which is not your case.
Splitting it into two properties is an interesting idea, and it may accomplish what you want: depreciate a portion of the building over 27.5 instead of 39 years. However, I'm not sure that the related complexity is worth it. You would have to be allocating all expenses between the two sub-properties, and it's a hassle. More hassle with refinancing, insurance etc.
There is a possibility that such split breaks some IRS rules. I'm not aware of it, but it's conceivable.
I also disagree with @Dave Toelkes regarding 6 properties on tax return. So, if we have a 100-door complex, we should have 100 properties? Pleeeze. The informal definition of one property for tax reporting is something that can be acquired or sold separately. Therefore, a duplex is one property. A 100-door apartment complex consisting of 3 buildings could be one property or 3 properties, but not 100 properties.