Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

61
Posts
22
Votes
Rick S.
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
22
Votes |
61
Posts

Do Co-owners Have to Deduct Expenses 50/50?

Rick S.
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
Posted

A partner and I own a rental SFR as Joint Tennants with 50% ownership each. In the past we have split all income and expenses evenly and claimed them 50/50 on each years tax returns. We sold the property in 2017 and split the proceeds 50/50. However, my partner paid $20k more in selling expenses than I did. Can she claim more than her 50% share of selling expenses on her 2017 tax return, or must we each claim 50% regardless of who actually paid for it?

I found this excerpt in IRS Pub 527, but it refers to rental expenses, and not sales expenses...

Part interest.

If you own a part interest in rental property, you can deduct expenses you paid according to your percentage of ownership.

Example.

Roger owns a one-half undivided interest in a rental house. Last year he paid $968 for necessary repairs on the property. Roger can deduct $484 (50% × $968) as a rental expense. He is entitled to reimbursement for the remaining half from the co-owner.

It sounds like the IRS forces income and expenses to be divided according to ownership percentages, but since I am not a tax expert, I thought I would ask a CPA here on BP. Thank you for any help.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,105
Posts
5,982
Votes
Michael Plaks
Pro Member
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
5,982
Votes |
5,105
Posts
Michael Plaks
Pro Member
#1 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent
  • Houston, TX
Replied

@Rick S.

Full discussion of various issues in your situation could be really long, and it's best addressed in a private consultation with a tax expert. I will give you something to start from, but it's not a complete answer. 

Based on your description, I assume that you were not filing a partnership return for the property. Probably you were each reporting 50% of rent income and 50% of expenses, and hopefully you were actually splitting income and expenses 50/50. (If not - then it's a major mess, best left for professionals to untangle.)

Under this scenario, here is how you should have handled the sale:

  1. From the sale proceeds, reimburse each other for your respective contributions to the closing costs.
  2. Whatever is left - split 50/50.
  3. For taxes, each of you will report half of the sales proceeds, adjusted for the combined closing costs.

If you can go back and do it this way - your economic parity will be intact, and so will be your tax reporting. If it's too late to adjust - then, again, you will have what I will label a mess. Not just for taxes, but for basic fairness. It's possible to compensate for on taxes (not economically, though), but it requires a tax professional.

Additional complications will arise if the sale was reported by your tittle company 100% under one of your SSNs, as opposed to 50/50. I bet that this IS how it was reported. The IRS will think that one of you received 100% of the proceeds, while you actually received 50% each. Once again, a problem that can be addressed by a tax professional who knows real estate.

  • Michael Plaks
  • Loading replies...