San Mateo, CA · Member since 2015 · 61 posts · 30 votes
8y
More specifically:
Do you think that the Schedule E, as a stand alone, qualifies for the 20% discount on taxable income as provided under the tax reform act passed in December of 2017? Or to qualify for this discount the Schedule E taxable income must come from a passthrough (i.e. LLC K-1)?
Investor · brentwood, CA · Member since 2016 · 1k+ posts · 730 votes
8y
The question is whether passive rental properties qualify for 199A treatment under the new law. Treasury has not issued any specific authoritative guidance specifically saying yes or no, but the balance of what we have seen so far from the professional community is that they likely will qualify.
Whether you hold it in your name or in an LLC makes no difference for purposes of 199A.
Tax Accountant / Enrolled Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2014 · 5k+ posts · 6k+ votes
8y
In a rare case of disagreement with @Natalie Kolodij, one of her statements is debatable, at a minimum:
"No it doesn't need to be in a business"
unless she meant "does not need to be in a separate business entity" - then we're on the same page.
The statutory language in the new law specifically refers to "trade or business" as a condition for the 20% deduction. As @Christopher Smith noted, there's no definition or clarity attached. Most tax pros expect (but it is just an educated guess at this point) this language to refer to the lousy Section 162 definition. In simple terms, you would need to be personally involved.
Simply owning a rental and reporting it on Schedule E does NOT automatically qualify it as a "trade or business" and consequently does NOT open it to 20% deduction. Some will qualify, and some will not.
And, as correctly pointed out by others, LLC does not change anything. It could be a minor factor in a debate whether it qualifies as a "trade or business" - but a minor one.
Also, before going much farther down this road: the 20% deduction is on NET income, after all deductions and depreciation. If your Schedule E shows a negative net, which is common for mortgaged properties, then there is nothing to discuss. 20% of zero is zero.
In a rare case of disagreement with @Natalie Kolodij, one of her statements is debatable, at a minimum:
"No it doesn't need to be in a business"
unless she meant "does not need to be in a separate business entity" - then we're on the same page.
The statutory language in the new law specifically refers to "trade or business" as a condition for the 20% deduction. As @Christopher Smith noted, there's no definition or clarity attached. Most tax pros expect (but it is just an educated guess at this point) this language to refer to the lousy Section 162 definition. In simple terms, you would need to be personally involved.
Simply owning a rental and reporting it on Schedule E does NOT automatically qualify it as a "trade or business" and consequently does NOT open it to 20% deduction. Some will qualify, and some will not.
And, as correctly pointed out by others, LLC does not change anything. It could be a minor factor in a debate whether it qualifies as a "trade or business" - but a minor one.
Also, before going much farther down this road: the 20% deduction is on NET income, after all deductions and depreciation. If your Schedule E shows a negative net, which is common for mortgaged properties, then there is nothing to discuss. 20% of zero is zero.
I just meant that he doesn't need to set up an LLC, Corp, Partnership ect to hold it in.